Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33942713›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Sniff-synchronized, gradient-guided olfactory search by freely moving mice.

Teresa M Findley, David G Wyrick, Jennifer L Cramer, Morgan A Brown, Blake Holcomb, Robin Attey, Dorian Yeh, Eric Monasevitch, Nelly Nouboussi, Isabelle Cullen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Visualizing and sonifying neurodata (ViSoND) for enhanced observation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Distinct brain regions map olfactory and visual spaces.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Mice navigate scent trails using predictive policies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Multisensory integration for active mechanosensation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Design Principles From Natural Olfaction for Electronic Noses.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Teresa M Findley *Department of Biology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2050-4869
David G Wyrick *Department of Biology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8096-5766
Jennifer L CramerDepartment of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Morgan A BrownDepartment of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Blake HolcombDepartment of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Robin AtteyDepartment of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9652-8103
Dorian YehDepartment of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Eric MonasevitchDepartment of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Nelly NouboussiDepartment of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Isabelle CullenDepartment of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Jeremea O SongcoDepartment of Biology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Jared F KingDepartment of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.
Yashar AhmadianDepartment of Biology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5942-0697
Matthew C SmearDepartment of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4689-388X
University of Oregon · US

Funding

Active sensing at the sensory surface: glomerular signals for olfactory navigation by freely-moving miceR34NS116731 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI SMEAR, MATTHEW C · 2020 to 2020
$645k
Concentration change representation in the olfactory bulbR56DC015584 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI SHUSTERMAN, ROMAN, SMEAR, MATTHEW C · 2017 to 2017
$558k
Impact of cortical feedback on odor concentration change codingR21NS104935 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI SHUSTERMAN, ROMAN, SMEAR, MATTHEW C · 2017 to 2018
$402k
Transparent graphene electrode arrays for simultaneous electrical and optical investigation of computations in the olfactory bulbF32MH118724 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI BROWN, MORGAN A · 2018 to 2021
$239k
Active Sensation during Odor-Guided Navigation in MiceF31DC016799 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI FINDLEY, TERESA M · 2017 to 2019
$101k
The impact of hallucinogens on active sampling and the olfactory bulbF31DC020671 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI WELCH, AMANDA COLETTE · 2023 to 2024
$94k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC016799NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC020671NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC015584NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH118724NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS104935NINDS NIH HHS R34 NS116731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many organisms, searching for relevant targets such as food or mates entails active, strategic sampling of the environment. Finding odorous targets may be the most ancient search problem that motile organisms evolved to solve. While chemosensory navigation has been well characterized in microorganisms and invertebrates, spatial olfaction in vertebrates is poorly understood. We have established an olfactory search assay in which freely moving mice navigate noisy concentration gradients of airborne odor. Mice solve this task using concentration gradient cues and do not require stereo olfaction for performance. During task performance, respiration and nose movement are synchronized with tens of milliseconds precision. This synchrony is present during trials and largely absent during inter-trial intervals, suggesting that sniff-synchronized nose movement is a strategic behavioral state rather than simply a constant accompaniment to fast breathing. To reveal the spatiotemporal structure of these active sensing movements, we used machine learning methods to parse motion trajectories into elementary movement motifs. Motifs fall into two clusters, which correspond to investigation and approach states. Investigation motifs lock precisely to sniffing, such that the individual motifs preferentially occur at specific phases of the sniff cycle. The allocentric structure of investigation and approach indicates an advantage to sampling both sides of the sharpest part of the odor gradient, consistent with a serial-sniff strategy for gradient sensing. This work clarifies sensorimotor strategies for mouse olfactory search and guides ongoing work into the underlying neural mechanisms.

Indexed as

MovementOdorantsAnimalsCuesFemaleFoodMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRespirationSmellTask Performance and Analysisactive sensingmousenavigationneuroethologyneuroscienceolfactionsearchsniff

Identifiers

PMID33942713
PMCPMC8169121
OpenAlexW3157740087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.