Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33931133›Full record

ArticleGenes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society2021

Development of a new quantitative structure-activity relationship model for predicting Ames mutagenicity of food flavor chemicals using StarDrop™ auto-Modeller™.

Toshio Kasamatsu, Airi Kitazawa, Sumie Tajima, Masahiro Kaneko, Kei-Ichi Sugiyama, Masami Yamada, Manabu Yasui, Kenichi Masumura, Katsuyoshi Horibata, Masamitsu Honma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. In vivo and in vitro mutagenicity of perillaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Toshio KasamatsuDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki city, Kanagawa, Japan.
Airi KitazawaDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki city, Kanagawa, Japan.
Sumie TajimaHULINKS Inc., Chuo city, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro KanekoHULINKS Inc., Chuo city, Tokyo, Japan.
Kei-Ichi SugiyamaDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki city, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masami YamadaDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki city, Kanagawa, Japan.
Manabu YasuiDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki city, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kenichi MasumuraDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki city, Kanagawa, Japan.
Katsuyoshi HoribataDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki city, Kanagawa, Japan.
Masamitsu HonmaDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki city, Kanagawa, Japan. honma@nihs.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7805-3290
National Institute of Health Sciences · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 20am0101123j0104Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Chemistry-Destination-005Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare H30-Food-General-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood flavors are relatively low molecular weight chemicals with unique odor-related functional groups that may also be associated with mutagenicity. These chemicals are often difficult to test for mutagenicity by the Ames test because of their low production and peculiar odor. Therefore, application of the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) approach is being considered. We used the StarDrop™ Auto-Modeller™ to develop a new QSAR model.

resultsIn the first step, we developed a new robust Ames database of 406 food flavor chemicals consisting of existing Ames flavor chemical data and newly acquired Ames test data. Ames results for some existing flavor chemicals have been revised by expert reviews. We also collected 428 Ames test datasets for industrial chemicals from other databases that are structurally similar to flavor chemicals. A total of 834 chemicals' Ames test datasets were used to develop the new QSAR models. We repeated the development and verification of prototypes by selecting appropriate modeling methods and descriptors and developed a local QSAR model. A new QSAR model "StarDrop NIHS 834_67" showed excellent performance (sensitivity: 79.5%, specificity: 96.4%, accuracy: 94.6%) for predicting Ames mutagenicity of 406 food flavors and was better than other commercial QSAR tools.

conclusionsA local QSAR model, StarDrop NIHS 834_67, was customized to predict the Ames mutagenicity of food flavor chemicals and other low molecular weight chemicals. The model can be used to assess the mutagenicity of food flavors without actual testing.

Indexed as

Food flavorsMachine learningMutagenicity Ames testQuantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR)StarDrop™ auto-Modeller™

Identifiers

PMID33931133
PMCPMC8088067
OpenAlexW3158808826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.