Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33888543›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2021

Periconception glycemic control and congenital anomalies in women with pregestational diabetes.

Annie M Dude, Nevert Badreldin, Amanda Schieler, Lynn M Yee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reproductive Health Counseling in the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Spatial Epidemiologic Analysis of Fetal Birth Defects in Guangxi, China.International journal of general medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annie M DudeDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA adude@bsd.uchicago.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9619-7853
Nevert BadreldinDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Amanda SchielerDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Lynn M YeeDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6274-0544
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Research Career Development in Obstetrics and GynecologyK12HD050121 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Serdar E. Bulun · 2005 to 2026
$7.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD050121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo assess the relationship between periconception glycemic control and congenital anomalies in a contemporary, diverse population of women with pregestational diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of all pregnant women with pregestational diabetes at a single institution (2003-2017) in the USA. The primary outcome was frequency of major or minor congenital anomalies. Glycemic control was assessed by periconception glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). The association of periconception HbA1c with pregnancy outcomes was assessed using bivariable and multivariable analyses.

resultsOur sample included 351 women, of which 63.8% had type 2 diabetes. Our study cohort is racially and ethnically diverse, with approximately equal numbers of women identifying as white non-Hispanic, black non-Hispanic and Hispanic, with 3.4% identifying as Asian. Of these 351 women, 52 (14.8%) had a fetus with a congenital anomaly, of whom the majority (n=43) had a major anomaly. Over half (51.1%) of all major anomalies were cardiovascular. Compared with the group with the best glycemic control (HbA1c ≤7.4%), which had an anomaly frequency of 10.2%, the frequency of congenital anomalies increased significantly with each category of worsening glycemic control (HbA1c 7.5%-9.4%: 20.6%, adjusted OR (aOR) 2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08 to 5.13; HbA1c 9.5% to 11.4%: 25.8%, aOR 2.86, 95% CI 1.08 to 7.59; HbA1c ≥11.5%: 37.5%, aOR 7.66, 95% CI 2.27 to 25.9).

conclusionIn a diverse cohort of women with pregestational diabetes, higher periconception HbA1c, especially HbA1c >9.5, was significantly associated with major congenital fetal anomalies. Our study sample is reflective of the current population of pregnant women with diabetes, including women with type 2 diabetes and from racial and ethnic minorities.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Pregnancy in DiabeticsFemaleGlycated HemoglobinGlycemic ControlHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesGlycated Hemoglobincongenital anomaliespregestational diabetespregnancy

Identifiers

PMID33888543
PMCPMC8070859
OpenAlexW3152662289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.