Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33598860›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2021

Valuation of SF-6Dv2 Health States in China Using Time Trade-off and Discrete-Choice Experiment with a Duration Dimension.

Jing Wu, Shitong Xie, Xiaoning He, Gang Chen, Gengliang Bai, Da Feng, Ming Hu, Jie Jiang, Xiaohui Wang, Hongyan Wu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Health state values in cancer patients and the general population: evidence from SF-6Dv2.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A head-to-head comparison of health utilities and measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among people living with HIV in China.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cancer-specific or generic preference-based measures in oncology? A validity comparison across six commonly diagnosed cancers.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  13. Testing culturally relevant EQ-5D-5L bolt-ons for the Chinese general population: first quantitative phase of a mixed methods study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Optimizing presentation formats for SF-6Dv2 health status valuation: a qualitative study using cognitive interviews.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jing WuSchool of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Room 209, 24th building, 92th Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300072, China. jingwu@tju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6012-2785
Shitong XieSchool of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Room 209, 24th building, 92th Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300072, China.
Xiaoning HeSchool of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Room 209, 24th building, 92th Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300072, China.
Gang ChenMonash Business School, Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Gengliang BaiSchool of Health Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Da FengSchool of Pharmacy, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Ming HuWest China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jie JiangCollege of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaohui WangSchool of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Hongyan WuSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Qunhong WuDepartment of Health Policy, Health Management College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
John E BrazierSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur objective was to generate a value set for the SF-6Dv2 using time trade-off (TTO) and a discrete-choice experiment with a duration dimension (DCE

methodsA large representative sample of the Chinese general population was recruited from eight provinces/municipalities in China, stratified by age, sex, education level, and proportion of urban/rural residence. Respondents completed eight TTO tasks and ten DCE

resultsIn total, 3320 respondents (50.3% male; range 18-90 years) were recruited. The random-effects model and the conditional logit model were preferred for the TTO and DCE

conclusionsThe Chinese value set for the SF-6Dv2 was established based on the TTO approach, but the DCE

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorChinaFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33598860
PMCPMC8079294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.