Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33372078›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

What is spiritual care? Professional perspectives on the concept of spiritual care identified through group concept mapping.

Niels Christian Hvidt, Kristina Tomra Nielsen, Alex K Kørup, Christina Prinds, Dorte Gilså Hansen, Dorte Toudal Viftrup, Elisabeth Assing Hvidt, Elisabeth Rokkjær Hammer, Erik Falkø, Flemming Locher and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Multidisciplinary oncology clinicians' experiences delivering spiritual care to patients with cancer and their care partners.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Niels Christian HvidtResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark nchvidt@health.sdu.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-6311-9784
Kristina Tomra NielsenDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University College of Northern Denmark (UCN), Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4944-9453
Alex K KørupResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1926-9435
Christina PrindsClinical Institute, Syddansk Universitet Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2070-4641
Dorte Gilså HansenIRS, Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5946-9968
Dorte Toudal ViftrupResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8254-6001
Elisabeth Assing HvidtResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3762-8478
Elisabeth Rokkjær HammerResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, SDU, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1101-1472
Erik FalkøResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7421-084X
Flemming LocherResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, JELLING, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4378-5779
Hanne Bess BoelsbjergInteracting Minds Centre, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1235-0206
Johan Albert WallinResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8225-7285
Karsten Flemming ThomsenResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9151-209X
Katja SchrøderDepartment of Public Health, Syddansk Universitet, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9100-7237
Lene MoestrupHealth Science Research Center, University College Lillebaelt - Campus Odense, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0978-664X
Ricko Damberg NissenResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5590-374X
Sif Stewart-FerrerResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4350-0051
Tobias Kvist StrippResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7271-3411
Vibeke Østergaard SteenfeldtCenter for Nursing, University College Absalon Campus Roskilde, Roskilde, Sjælland, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2724-6815
Jens SøndergaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1629-1864
Eva Ejlersen WæhrensThe Research Initiative for Activity studies and Occupational Therapy, Research Unit of User Perspectives, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0846-1659

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe overall study aim was to synthesise understandings and experiences regarding the concept of spiritual care (SC). More specifically, to identify, organise and prioritise experiences with the way SC is conceived and practised by professionals in research and the clinic.

designGroup concept mapping (GCM).

settingThe study was conducted within a university setting in Denmark.

participantsResearchers, students and clinicians working with SC on a daily basis in the clinic and/or through research participated in brainstorming (n=15), sorting (n=15), rating and validation (n=13).

resultsApplying GCM, ideas were identified, organised and prioritised online. A total of 192 unique ideas of SC were identified and organised into six clusters. The results were discussed and interpreted at a validation meeting. Based on input from the validation meeting a conceptual model was developed. The model highlights three overall themes: (1) 'SC as an integral but overlooked aspect of healthcare' containing the two clusters SC as a part of healthcare and perceived significance; (2) 'delivering SC' containing the three clusters quality in attitude and action, relationship and help and support, and finally (3) 'the role of spirituality' containing a single cluster.

conclusionBecause spirituality is predominantly seen as a fundamental aspect of each individual human being, particularly important during suffering, SC should be an integral aspect of healthcare, although it is challenging to handle. SC involves paying attention to patients' values and beliefs, requires adequate skills and is realised in a relationship between healthcare professional and patient founded on trust and confidence.

Indexed as

SpiritualitySpiritual TherapiesAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle Agedmedical ethicspalliative carepublic healthrehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID33372078
PMCPMC7772306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.