Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33352683›Full record

ReviewPolymers2020

Modified Fish Gelatin as an Alternative to Mammalian Gelatin in Modern Food Technologies.

Svetlana R Derkach, Nikolay G Voron'ko, Yuliya A Kuchina, Daria S Kolotova

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Preparation and Characterization of Eel (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development of Jellyfish (Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Svetlana R DerkachDepartment of Chemistry, Murmansk State Technical University, 183010 Murmansk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5871-9320
Nikolay G Voron'koDepartment of Chemistry, Murmansk State Technical University, 183010 Murmansk, Russia.
Yuliya A KuchinaDepartment of Chemistry, Murmansk State Technical University, 183010 Murmansk, Russia.
Daria S KolotovaDepartment of Chemistry, Murmansk State Technical University, 183010 Murmansk, Russia.
Murmansk State Technical University · RU

Funding

Russian Foundation for Basic Research 19-016-00118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review considers the main properties of fish gelatin that determine its use in food technologies. A comparative analysis of the amino acid composition of gelatin from cold-water and warm-water fish species, in comparison with gelatin from mammals, which is traditionally used in the food industry, is presented. Fish gelatin is characterized by a reduced content of proline and hydroxyproline which are responsible for the formation of collagen-like triple helices. For this reason, fish gelatin gels are less durable and have lower gelation and melting temperatures than mammalian gelatin. These properties impose significant restrictions on the use of fish gelatin in the technology of gelled food as an alternative to porcine and bovine gelatin. This problem can be solved by modifying the functional characteristics of fish gelatin by adding natural ionic polysaccharides, which, under certain conditions, are capable of forming polyelectrolyte complexes with gelatin, creating additional nodes in the spatial network of the gel.

Indexed as

amino-acid compositionfish gelatinrheologysole-gel transition

Identifiers

PMID33352683
PMCPMC7766531
OpenAlexW3114707268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.