Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33151486›Full record

ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2020

Meet the Meat Alternatives: The Value of Alternative Protein Sources.

Aravind Thavamani, Thomas J Sferra, Senthilkumar Sankararaman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current nutrition reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Role of SimulatedNutrients · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Impact of Ultrasonication on African Oil Bean (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aravind ThavamaniUH Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Thomas J SferraUH Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Senthilkumar SankararamanUH Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. Senthilkumar.Sankararaman@uhhospitals.org.ORCID 0000-0003-3094-9703

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMeat alternatives are non-animal-based proteins with chemical characteristics and aesthetic qualities comparable to meat. The global increase in meat consumption is associated with the adverse environmental impacts such as increased greenhouse gas emissions contributing to global warming and higher water/land use. In this review, we focus on the development, availability, and nutritional value of various meat alternatives and their impact on meat consumption. RECENT

findingsChanging dietary patterns and drive for environmental conservation contribute to the recent increase in the consumption of environmental friendly sources of proteins such as plant-based and mycoprotein-based meat alternatives. Perceived lack of naturalness and poor cultural acceptance present as roadblocks for widespread societal acceptance for meat alternatives. Continued research and efforts are needed to make the meat alternatives more aesthetically appealing with improved nutritive value.

Indexed as

DietNutritive ValueAnimalsDatabases, FactualDietary ProteinsEnvironmentFood SafetyGlobal WarmingGreenhouse GasesHumansInsectaMeatProteinsDietary ProteinsGreenhouse GasesProteinsCultured meatEntomophagyInsect proteinMeat alternativesMeat analogsMeat substitutesMycoproteinPlant proteinsProcessed meatRed meat

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.