Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33088825›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Formic Acid as an Antimicrobial for Poultry Production: A Review.

Steven C Ricke, Dana K Dittoe, Kurt E Richardson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Insect Lipids: Structure, Classification and Function.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Potential Antidiabetic Inhibitors and Antimicrobials from the FungusJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prebiotic effects ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Biomolecule screen identifies several inhibitors ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven C RickeDepartment of Food Science, Center of Food Safety, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Dana K DittoeDepartment of Food Science, Center of Food Safety, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Kurt E RichardsonAnitox Corporation, Lawrenceville, GA, United States.
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organic acids continue to receive considerable attention as feed additives for animal production. Most of the emphasis to date has focused on food safety aspects, particularly on lowering the incidence of foodborne pathogens in poultry and other livestock. Several organic acids are currently either being examined or are already being implemented in commercial settings. Among the several organic acids that have been studied extensively, is formic acid. Formic acid has been added to poultry diets as a means to limit

Indexed as

antimicrobialfeedfood animalsfoodborne pathogenformic acidgastrointestinal tract

Identifiers

PMID33088825
PMCPMC7494846
OpenAlexW3081832058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.