Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33015358›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2020

Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants: A Resident-Based Workshop to Improve Knowledge and Confidence.

Irsk Anderson, Vineet M Arora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Irsk AndersonAssistant Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine.
Vineet M AroraProfessor, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prescriptions have increased steadily since the first, dabigatran, was Food and Drug Administration-approved in 2010. They have multiple advantages over vitamin K antagonists including fixed dosing without coagulation lab monitoring, rapid onset and offset of action, and fewer drug and food interactions. Patient-specific dosing, administration education, adherence, and monitoring are critically important. Many providers are unfamiliar with these concepts and too often use DOACs for off-label indications or at off-label dosing. A DOAC workshop was created to address knowledge gaps and improve internal medicine resident prescribing confidence. Methods: One author (Irsk Anderson) conducted four 1-hour DOAC workshops with 49 total internal medicine residents rotating on their outpatient clinical rotation between October 2018 and November 2019. Residents performed small-group learning around four DOAC-specific cases, followed by a large-group report-out session. The residents completed pre- and postworkshop multiple-choice questions (MCQs) to assess knowledge as well as a postworkshop DOAC confidence self-assessment. Results: Resident knowledge, assessed by percentage of residents answering correctly, improved significantly for all four MCQs after completing the workshop (all Discussion: A 1-hour DOAC workshop was feasible and improved internal medicine resident knowledge and self-confidence. Future work should assess behavior change and patient clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsFactor Xa InhibitorsAdministration, OralBlood CoagulationDabigatranHumansUnited StatesAnticoagulantsDabigatranFactor Xa InhibitorsCase-Based LearningDirect-Acting AnticoagulantsInternal MedicineMedical ResidentsPhysician

Identifiers

PMID33015358
PMCPMC7526504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.