ReviewJournal of general internal medicine2020
Using Peer Feedback to Promote Clinical Excellence in Hospital Medicine.
Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Best Practice Meetings on Outcomes of Esophageal Cancer Surgery in the Netherlands.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of COACH2COACH and R2C2 (Relationship, Reaction, Content, Coaching) Model in Improving Peer-feedback for students' professional development.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Transforming Feedback into Learning Throughout the Trajectory of Competency Based Medical Education.Indian pediatrics · 2025Review
- Peer-to-Peer Case Review as a Strategy to Improve Sepsis Education in Graduate Medical Education.Spartan medical research journal · 2025Article
- Unmasking unconstructive online feedback in orthodontics.The Angle orthodontist · 2024Article
- Reconstructing feedback in graduate medical education: development of the REFLECT scale to measure feedback delivery in medical residency training.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Strategies to Improve Mentorship and Foster Career Advancement in Academic Hospital Medicine.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Cohort study of hospitalists' procedural skills: baseline competence and durability after simulation-based training.BMJ open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hospitalists provide a significant amount of direct clinical care in both academic and community hospitals. Peer feedback is a potentially underutilized and low resource method for improving clinical performance, which lends itself well to the frequent patient care handoffs that occur in the practice of hospital medicine. We review current literature on peer feedback to provide an overview of this performance improvement tool, briefly describe its incorporation into multi-source clinical performance appraisals across disciplines, highlight how peer feedback is currently used in hospital medicine, and present practical steps for hospital medicine programs to implement peer feedback to foster clinical excellence among their clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.