Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32954057›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in systems biology2017

Systems biology of lactic acid bacteria: For food and thought.

Bas Teusink, Douwe Molenaar

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in systems biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nutrient control enables metabolic reconstruction ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Produced byMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. American journal of translational research · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Why do lactic acid bacteria thrive in chain elongation microbiomes?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bas TeusinkAmsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, O|2 Building, Section Systems Bioinformatics, Location Code 2E51, De Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Douwe MolenaarAmsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines and Systems, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, O|2 Building, Section Systems Bioinformatics, Location Code 2E51, De Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
TiFN · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) ferment plants, fish, meats and milk and turn them into tasty food products with increased shelf life; other LAB help digesting food and create a healthy environment in the intestine. The economic and societal importance of these relatively simple and small bacteria is immense. In this review we hope to show that their adaptations to nutrient-rich environments provides fascinating and often puzzling behaviours that give rise to many fundamental evolutionary biological questions in need of a systems biology approach. We will provide examples of such questions, compare the (metabolic) behaviour of LAB to that of other model organisms, and provide the latest insights, if available.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyFood fermentationLactic acid bacteriaLactobacillusLactococcusSystems biology

Identifiers

PMID32954057
PMCPMC7489361
OpenAlexW2738197621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.