Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32949359›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Concentration and health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in commercial tea and coffee samples marketed in Iran.

Aliakbar Roudbari, Roshanak Rafiei Nazari, Nabi Shariatifar, Mojtaba Moazzen, Anna Abdolshahi, Solmaz Mirzamohammadi, Masoumeh Madani-Tonekaboni, Mehri Delvarianzadeh, Majid Arabameri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Roasted Pork Meat and the Effect of Dried Fruits on PAH Content.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aliakbar RoudbariCenter for Health Related Social and Behavioral Sciences Research, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Roshanak Rafiei NazariDepartment of Physics, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Nabi ShariatifarDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2861-5758
Mojtaba MoazzenDepartment of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Anna AbdolshahiFood Safety Research Center (salt), School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Solmaz MirzamohammadiSchool of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Masoumeh Madani-TonekaboniVice-chancellery of food and drug, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Mehri DelvarianzadehCenter for Health Related Social and Behavioral Sciences Research, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Majid ArabameriVice-chancellery of food and drug, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran. majid.arabamerei@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0422-037X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the probabilistic health risk and the concentration of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in commercial tea and coffee samples. For determining the mentioned contaminants in sixty-four samples, a reliable and sensitive technique was validated and developed. The technique is established on magnetic solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis (MSPE/GC-MS). The maximum mean of ƩPAHs in coffee samples was 13.75 ± 2.90 μg kg

Indexed as

Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsAdultChildCoffeeFood ContaminationHumansIranRisk AssessmentTeaCoffeePolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsTeaCoffeeHealth risk assessmentMSMSPE/GCPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsTea

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.