Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32880909›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of dermatology2021

A head-to-head comparison of ixekizumab vs. guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 24-week efficacy and safety results from a randomized, double-blinded trial.

A Blauvelt, C Leonardi, B Elewski, J J Crowley, L C Guenther, M Gooderham, R G Langley, R Vender, A Pinter, C E M Griffiths and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03573323 (A 24-Week Multicenter, Randomized, Blinded, Parallel-Group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab to Guselkumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03573323 phase4completednot on this map

A 24-Week Multicenter, Randomized, Blinded, Parallel-Group Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Ixekizumab to Guselkumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2018 to 2020Enrolled1,027ConditionsPlaque PsoriasisArmsIxekizumab, Guselkumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A review of core immuno-inflammatory mechanisms and key regulatory targets in psoriasis.American journal of clinical and experimental immunology · 2026
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

A BlauveltOregon Medical Research Center, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2633-985X
C LeonardiCentral Dermatology, St Louis, MO, USA.
B ElewskiDeparment of Dermatology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1475-2874
J J CrowleyBakersfield Dermatology and Skin Cancer Medical Group, Bakersfield, CA, USA.
L C GuentherGuenther Research Inc, London, ON, Canada.
M GooderhamSKiN Centre for Dermatology, Peterborough, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8926-0113
R G LangleyDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
R VenderDermatrials Research Inc, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2624-2724
A PinterClinic for Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1330-1502
C E M GriffithsDermatology Centre, Salford Royal Hospital, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Y TadaDepartment of Dermatology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
H ElmaraghyEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
R G LimaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
G GalloEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
L RendaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
R BurgeEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7907-6400
S Y ParkEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
B ZhuEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
K PappProbity Medical Research, Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9557-3642
IXORA-R Study Group

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSignificantly more patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with the interleukin (IL)-17A inhibitor ixekizumab vs. the IL-23p19 inhibitor guselkumab in the IXORA-R head-to-head trial achieved 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100) at week 12.

objectivesTo compare skin and nail clearance and patient-reported outcomes for ixekizumab vs. guselkumab, up to week 24.

methodsIXORA-R enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, defined as static Physician's Global Assessment ≥ 3, PASI ≥ 12 and involved body surface area ≥ 10%. Statistical comparisons were performed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by pooled site. Time-to-first-event comparisons were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and P-values were generated using adjusted log-rank tests stratified by treatment group. Cumulative days at clinical and patient-reported responses were compared by ancova. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03573323).

resultsOf the 1027 patients randomly assigned, 90% completed the trial (465 of 520 ixekizumab and 459 of 507 guselkumab). As early as week 2 and through week 16, more patients on ixekizumab achieved PASI 100 (P < 0·01). At week 24, ixekizumab was noninferior to guselkumab (50% vs. 52%, difference -2·3%), with no statistically significant difference in PASI 100 (P = 0·41). More patients receiving ixekizumab showed completely clear nails at week 24 (52% vs. 31%, P = 0·007). The median time to first PASI 50/75/90 and PASI 100 were 2 and 7·5 weeks shorter, respectively, for patients on ixekizumab vs. guselkumab (P < 0·001). Patients on ixekizumab also had a greater cumulative benefit, with more days at PASI 90 and 100, with Dermatology Life Quality Index of 0 or 1, and itch free (P < 0·05). The frequency of serious adverse events was 3% for each group, with no new safety signals.

conclusionsIxekizumab was noninferior to guselkumab in complete skin clearance and superior in clearing nails at week 24. Ixekizumab cleared skin more rapidly in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, with a greater cumulative benefit, than guselkumab. Overall, the safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile for ixekizumab.

Indexed as

PsoriasisAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodHumansSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedguselkumabixekizumab

Identifiers

PMID32880909
PMCPMC8246960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.