SynthesisPloS one2020
Flipped classroom improves nursing students' theoretical learning in China: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Identifying Research Priorities in Digital Education for Health Care: Umbrella Review and Modified Delphi Method Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Flipped classroom improves student learning outcome in Chinese pharmacy education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- The effects of flipped classroom versus lecture-based learning on academic performance and perceptions of classroom environment among nursing students: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Performance of flipped classroom teaching method during hemodialysis training of nurses.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2025Trial
- CRISP method with flipped classroom approach in ECG teaching of arrhythmia for trainee nurses: a randomized controlled study.BMC medical education · 2022Trial
- The effect of Flipped Classroom through Near Peer Education (FC through NPE) on patient safety knowledge retention in nursing and midwifery students: a solomon four-group design.BMC medical education · 2022Trial
- A step-by-step training system for endoscopic suturing and ligation incorporating flipped learning into e-learning: the Gunma step-by-step training e-learning procedure (G-STEP).Surgery today · 2026Article
- Nursing students' perception of integrating flipped learning in a nursing theory course: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Exploring cognitive and motivational impacts of flipped English classrooms: perspectives from teachers in a Chinese art university.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Qualitative research on the flipped classroom cognition of undergraduate nursing students.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Assessing the effectiveness of flipped classroom teaching-learning method among undergraduate medical students at gondar university, college of medicine and health sciences: an interventional study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Effects of flipped classroom teaching in anaesthesiology residents: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Article
- Application of the hybrid BOPPPS teaching model in clinical internships in gynecology.BMC medical education · 2023Observational
- A conceptual review of the effectiveness of flipped learning in vocational learners' cognitive skills and emotional states.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- Application of the Inverted Classroom Model for Teaching Pathophysiology to Chinese Undergraduate Medical Students: Usability Study.JMIR medical education · 2021Article
- Enhancing generic capabilities and metacognitive awareness of first-year nursing students using active learning strategy.BMC nursing · 2021Article
- A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews on Blended Learning: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions.Psychology research and behavior management · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAt present, current didactic teaching delivery method help nursing students apply theory to clinical situations in an inefficient way. The flipped classroom (FC), a novel teaching mode emphasizing self-study and critical thinking, has generated interest in nursing education in China. However, there are a gap in the literature and no consistent outcomes of current studies which compared FC and lecture-based learning (LBL), and no systematic review has comprehensively compared theoretical scores as an affected outcome in FC versus LBL modes.
methodsIn this review, we analyze flipped-learning nursing students' scores, and aim to assess the efficacy and provide a deeper understanding of the FC in nursing education. Following the inclusion criteria, articles were obtained by searching PubMed, Embase and Chinese data, including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and VIP database until 3 January 2020. Data were extracted from eligible articles and quality was assessed. A meta-analysis was then performed using a random effects model with a standardized mean value (SMD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI).32 studies were included after reviewing 2,439 citations. All studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The FC theoretical knowledge scores in FC were significantly positively affected compared to those of the traditional classroom (SMD = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.02-1.64; P < 0.001). In addition, 23 studies reported skill scores, indicating significant difference between the FC mode and LBL mode (SMD = 1.58, 95%CI: 1.23-1.93; P < 0.001).
conclusionsThe results of this meta-analysis suggest that compared to the LBL teaching method, the FC mode dose significantly improve Chinese nursing students' theoretical scores. However, the problems of heterogeneity and publication bias in this study need to be remedied high-quality future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.