Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32731994›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Study of the antibiotic residues in poultry meat in some of the EU countries and selection of the best compositions of lactic acid bacteria and essential oils against Salmonella enterica.

Elena Bartkiene, Modestas Ruzauskas, Vadims Bartkevics, Iveta Pugajeva, Paulina Zavistanaviciute, Vytaute Starkute, Egle Zokaityte, Vita Lele, Agila Dauksiene, Michael Grashorn and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Bioprospecting Antimicrobials fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Elena BartkieneInstitute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania; Department of Food Safety and Quality, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania. Electronic address: elena.bartkiene@lsmuni.lt.
Modestas RuzauskasInstitute of Microbiology and Virology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania; Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Vadims BartkevicsInstitute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment BIOR, 1076 Riga, Latvia.
Iveta PugajevaInstitute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment BIOR, 1076 Riga, Latvia.
Paulina ZavistanaviciuteInstitute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania; Department of Food Safety and Quality, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Vytaute StarkuteInstitute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania; Department of Food Safety and Quality, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Egle ZokaityteInstitute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania; Department of Food Safety and Quality, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Vita LeleInstitute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania; Department of Food Safety and Quality, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Agila DauksieneInstitute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania; Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 47181, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Michael GrashornInstitute of Animal Science at University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Ludwig E HoelzleInstitute of Animal Science at University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Anara MendybayevaResearch Institute of Applied Biotechnology, Kostanay State University, 110000 Kostanay, Kazakhstan.
Raushan RyshyanovaResearch Institute of Applied Biotechnology, Kostanay State University, 110000 Kostanay, Kazakhstan.
Romas GruzauskasDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Kaunas University of Technology, 50254, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTInstitute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment “BIOR” · LVKostanay State University A Baitursynov · KZUniversity of Hohenheim · DEKaunas University of Technology · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the presence of antibiotics (ANB) residues was evaluated in poultry meat purchased from German and Lithuanian markets. In addition, the antimicrobial activity of 13 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains, 2 essential oils (EO) (Thymus vulgaris and Origanum vulgare L.), and their compositions were tested for the purpose of inhibiting antibiotic-resistant Salmonella spp. ANB residues were found in 3 out of the 20 analyzed poultry meat samples: sample no. 8 contained enrofloxacin (0.46 μg/kg), sample no. 14 contained both enrofloxacin and doxycycline (0.05 and 16.8 μg/kg, respectively), and sample no. 18 contained enrofloxacin (2.06 μg/kg). The maximum residue limits (MRLs) for the sum of enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin and for doxycycline in the poultry muscle are 100 μg/kg. Finally, none of the tested poultry meat samples exceeded the suggested MRLs; however, the issue of ANB residues still requires monitoring of the poultry industry in Germany, Poland, and Lithuania, despite the currently established low ANB concentrations. These findings can be explained by the increased use of alternatives to ANB in the poultry industry. Our results showed that an effective alternative to ANB, which can help to reduce the occurrence of antibiotic-resistant salmonella, is a composition containing 1.0% of thyme EO and the following LAB strains: Lactobacillus plantrum LUHS122, Enteroccocus pseudoavium LUHS242, Lactobacillus casei LUHS210, Lactobacillus paracasei LUHS244, Lactobacillus plantarum LUHS135, Lactobacillus coryniformins LUHS71, and Lactobacillus uvarum LUHS245, which can be recommended for poultry industry as components of feed or for the treatment of surfaces, to control the contamination with Salmonella strains. However, it should be mentioned that most of the tested LAB strains were inhibited by thyme EO at the concentrations of 0.5 and 1.0%, except for LUHS122, LUHS210, and LUHS245. Finally, it can be noted that the agents responsible for the inhibitory effect on Salmonella are not the viable LAB strains but rather their metabolites, and further studies are needed to identify which metabolites are the most important.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsFood MicrobiologyLactobacillalesMeatOils, VolatileSalmonella entericaAnimalsEuropean UnionPoultryAnti-Bacterial AgentsOils, Volatileantibiotic residuesantimicrobial activitymeatpoultrySalmonella

Identifiers

PMID32731994
PMCPMC7597929
OpenAlexW3030864076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.