Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32626100›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2019

Update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 9: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2018.

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Kostas Koutsoumanis, Ana Allende, Avelino Álvarez-Ordóñez, Declan Bolton, Sara Bover-Cid, Marianne Chemaly, Robert Davies, Friederike Hilbert, Roland Lindqvist and 16 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. GABA-ProducingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Hybridization ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Influence of the MicroalgaFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Safety and efficacy of l-glutamine produced usingEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020
    Article
  13. Safety and efficacy of l-isoleucine produced by fermentation withEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Safety of heat-killedEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
Kostas Koutsoumanis
Ana Allende
Avelino Álvarez-Ordóñez
Declan Bolton
Sara Bover-Cid
Marianne Chemaly
Robert Davies
Friederike Hilbert
Roland Lindqvist
Maarten Nauta
Luisa Peixe
Giuseppe Ru
Marion Simmons
Panagiotis Skandamis
Elisabetta Suffredini
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez
Miguel Prieto Maradona
Amparo Querol
Juan Evaristo Suarez
Ingvar Sundh
Just Vlak
Fulvio Barizzone
Sandra Correia
Lieve Herman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) procedure was developed to provide a harmonised generic pre-evaluation to support safety risk assessments of biological agents performed by EFSA's Scientific Panels. The taxonomic identity, body of knowledge, safety concerns and antimicrobial resistance were assessed. Safety concerns identified for a taxonomic unit are, where possible and reasonable in number, reflected by 'qualifications' which should be assessed at the strain level by the EFSA's Scientific Panels. During the current assessment, no new information was found that would change the previously recommended QPS taxonomic units and their qualifications. Between April and September 2018, the QPS notification list was updated with 48 microorganisms from applications for market authorisation. Of these, 30 biological agents already had QPS status, 15 were excluded from the QPS exercise by the previous QPS mandate (five filamentous fungi) or from further evaluations within the current mandate (two notifications of

Indexed as

bacteriaCorynebacterium glutamicumKomagataeibacter sucrofermentansMycobacterium setensePseudomonas fluorescensQPSsafetyyeast

Identifiers

PMID32626100
PMCPMC7328880
OpenAlexW4232083736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.