Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32625696›Full record

ReviewEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2018

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance copper compounds copper(I), copper(II) variants namely copper hydroxide, copper oxychloride, tribasic copper sulfate, copper(I) oxide, Bordeaux mixture.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Maria Arena, Domenica Auteri, Stefania Barmaz, Giulia Bellisai, Alba Brancato, Daniela Brocca, Laszlo Bura, Harry Byers, Arianna Chiusolo and 38 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Chemical Profiling and Cheminformatic Insights intoMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Antibacterial Activity of Copper Nanoparticles againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Do DOM optical parameters improve the prediction of copper availability in vineyard soils?Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Chronic Copper Sulfate Poisoning.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

48 authors.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Maria Arena
Domenica Auteri
Stefania Barmaz
Giulia Bellisai
Alba Brancato
Daniela Brocca
Laszlo Bura
Harry Byers
Arianna Chiusolo
Daniele Court Marques
Federica Crivellente
Chloe De Lentdecker
Mark Egsmose
Zoltan Erdos
Gabriella Fait
Lucien Ferreira
Marina Goumenou
Luna Greco
Alessio Ippolito
Frederique Istace
Samira Jarrah
Dimitra Kardassi
Renata Leuschner
Christopher Lythgo
Jose Oriol Magrans
Paula Medina
Ileana Miron
Tunde Molnar
Alexandre Nougadere
Laura Padovani
Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Ragnor Pedersen
Hermine Reich
Angela Sacchi
Miguel Santos
Rositsa Serafimova
Rachel Sharp
Alois Stanek
Franz Streissl
Juergen Sturma
Csaba Szentes
Jose Tarazona
Andrea Terron
Anne Theobald
Benedicte Vagenende
Alessia Verani
Laura Villamar-Bouza

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, France, and co-rapporteur Member State, Germany, for the pesticide active substance copper compounds are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of copper compounds as a fungicide on grapes, tomatoes and cucurbits. The reliable end points appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.

Indexed as

copper compoundsfungicidepeer reviewpesticiderisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID32625696
PMCPMC7009614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.