Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32415368›Full record

ArticleAMB Express2020

Isolation of novel Lactobacillus with lipolytic activity from the vinasse and their preliminary potential using as probiotics.

Chengran Guan, Zhiqiang Tao, Li Wang, Ruifeng Zhao, Xuan Chen, Xinyuan Huang, Jianbo Su, Zhen Lu, Xia Chen, Ruixia Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMB Express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biotechnological potential of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Shirota for bioemulsifier, bacteriocin and lipase production.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chengran GuanKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225127, Jiangsu, China.
Zhiqiang TaoKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225127, Jiangsu, China.
Li WangKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225127, Jiangsu, China.
Ruifeng ZhaoKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225127, Jiangsu, China.
Xuan ChenKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225127, Jiangsu, China.
Xinyuan HuangKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225127, Jiangsu, China.
Jianbo SuKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225127, Jiangsu, China.
Zhen LuBloomage Biotechnology Corporation Limited, Jinan, 250000, Shandong, China.
Xia ChenKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225127, Jiangsu, China.
Ruixia GuKey Lab of Dairy Biotechnology and Safety Control, College of Food Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225127, Jiangsu, China. 444306783@qq.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6145-2949

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31700079Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20170496
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactobacillus casei f1, L. paracasei f2 and L. paracasei f3 with lipolytic activity were isolated and identified from vinasses according to the morphological-physiological properties detection and 16S rDNA analysis. These three strains showed obvious lipase activities to olive oil and L. casei f1 performed highest enzyme activity of 17.8 U/mL. L. casei f1, L. paracasei f2 and L. paracasei f3 could lipolyze the blending oils, peanut oil and sesame oil with diverse degrading rates. The degrading rates to the preferred oils, L. casei f1 to blending oils, L. paracasei f2 to peanut oil and L. paracasei f3 to sesame oil, were 21.2%, 27.3% and 39.6%, respectively. The corresponding oil degrading rates increased as the cell growth and the highest degrading rates were obtained at the stationary phase with the viable count more than 7.5 LogCFU/mL. By GC-MS analysis, L. casei f1, L. paracasei f2 and L. paracasei f3 performed diverse lipolytic capacities to the 12 kinds of fat acids and all of them preferred to hydrolyze the linoleic acid with the degrading rate of 49.11%, 31.83% and 64.44%, respectively. These three strains showed considerable probiotic properties, displaying higher than 10

Indexed as

Degrading rateLactobacillusLipaseLipolytic capacityProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID32415368
PMCPMC7229107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.