Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32342178›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2021

Validation of the German Version of Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS-G) for Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES).

Samra Hamzic, Tobias Braun, Martin Juenemann, Marius Butz, Robert Voswinckel, Michael Belly, Oliver Vogelbusch, Susanne Weber, Hasan Khilan, Manfred Kaps and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samra HamzicDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Hesse, Germany. samra.hamzic@neuro.med.uni-giessen.de.
Tobias BraunDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Hesse, Germany.
Martin JuenemannDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Hesse, Germany.
Marius ButzDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Hesse, Germany.
Robert VoswinckelBuergerhospital Friedberg (Hesse), Stroke Unit, Ockstaedter Str. 3-5, 61169, Friedberg, Hesse, Germany.
Michael BellyBuergerhospital Friedberg (Hesse), Stroke Unit, Ockstaedter Str. 3-5, 61169, Friedberg, Hesse, Germany.
Oliver VogelbuschDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Hesse, Germany.
Susanne WeberBuergerhospital Friedberg (Hesse), Stroke Unit, Ockstaedter Str. 3-5, 61169, Friedberg, Hesse, Germany.
Hasan KhilanBuergerhospital Friedberg (Hesse), Stroke Unit, Ockstaedter Str. 3-5, 61169, Friedberg, Hesse, Germany.
Manfred KapsDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Hesse, Germany.
Tibo GerrietsDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Hesse, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) is the most frequently used scale for the evaluation of functional oral intake by dysphagia patients. FOIS was validated using data from Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS). Until now, a validated German version of FOIS for Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) is lacking. The aim of this study was a cross-cultural validation of the German version of FOIS (FOIS-G) for FEES. The translation of the original FOIS was carried out according to the Translation, Review, Adjudication, Pretesting, Documentation (TRAPD) translation methodology. For the validation process, six experienced language therapists (SLT) retrospectively analyzed charts of 93 stroke patients. Inclusion criteria were comprised of stroke, clinical examination by an SLT within 24 h of admission, and FEES within 72 h of admission. The validity was calculated by comparison with Modified Rankin Scale (MRS), Barthel Index (BI), the Penetration-Aspiration-Scale (PAS), and a water swallow test. Spearman rank correlation of all paired raters ranged from r

Indexed as

DeglutitionDeglutition DisordersHumansLanguageReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesCross-cultural adaptationDeglutitionDeglutition disordersDysphagiaFEESFOISGerman versionValidation

Identifiers

PMID32342178
PMCPMC7803872
OpenAlexW3019286368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.