Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32245450›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Exploring challenges in quality and safety work in nursing homes and home care - a case study as basis for theory development.

Terese Johannessen, Eline Ree, Ingunn Aase, Roland Bal, Siri Wiig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Terese JohannessenFaculty of Health Sciences, SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholms gate 39, 4021, Stavanger, Norway. terese.johannessen@uis.no.
Eline ReeFaculty of Health Sciences, SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholms gate 39, 4021, Stavanger, Norway.
Ingunn AaseFaculty of Health Sciences, SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholms gate 39, 4021, Stavanger, Norway.
Roland BalErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Siri WiigFaculty of Health Sciences, SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholms gate 39, 4021, Stavanger, Norway.
University of Stavanger · NOErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 256681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement, culture and systems for better quality and patient safety in hospitals have been widely studied in Norway. Nursing homes and home care, however have received much less attention. An increasing number of people need health services in nursing homes and at home, and the services are struggling with fragmentation of care, discontinuity and restricted resource availability. The aim of the study was to explore the current challenges in quality and safety work as perceived by managers and employees in nursing homes and home care services.

methodThe study is a multiple explorative case study of two nursing homes and two home care services in Norway. Managers and employees participated in focus groups and individual interviews. The data material was analyzed using directed content analysis guided by the theoretical framework 'Organizing for Quality', focusing on the work needed to meet quality and safety challenges.

resultsChallenges in quality and safety work were interrelated and depended on many factors. In addition, they often implied trade-offs for both managers and employees. Managers struggled to maintain continuity of care due to sick leave and continuous external-facilitated change processes. Employees struggled with heavier workloads and fewer resources, resulting in less time with patients and poorer quality of patient care. The increased external pressure affected the possibility to work towards engagement and culture for improvement, and to maintain quality and safety as a collective effort at managerial and employee levels.

conclusionDespite contextual differences due to the structure, size, nature and location of the nursing homes and home care services, the challenges were similar across settings. Our study indicates a dualistic contextual dimension. Understanding contextual factors is central for targeting improvement interventions to specific settings. Context is, however, not independent from the work that managers do; it can be and is acted upon in negotiations and interactions to better support managers' and employees' work on quality and safety in nursing homes and home care.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHome Care ServicesHumansInterviews as TopicNorwayNursing HomesPatient SafetyQuality of Health CareContextEmployeesHome careLeadershipNursing homeQuality challengesSafetyTheory development

Identifiers

PMID32245450
PMCPMC7118914
OpenAlexW3014594451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.