Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221683›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

Endovascular simulation training: a tool to increase enthusiasm for interventional radiology among medical students.

Fabian Stoehr, Sebastian Schotten, Michael B Pitton, Christoph Dueber, Franziska Schmidt, Nienke L Hansen, Bettina Baeßler, Roman Kloeckner, Daniel Pinto Dos Santos

Abstract readMulticenter StudyVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabian StoehrDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Sebastian SchottenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Michael B PittonDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Christoph DueberDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Franziska SchmidtCenter for Quality Assurance and Development, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Nienke L HansenDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Bettina BaeßlerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Roman Kloeckner *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. Roman.Kloeckner@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5492-4792
Daniel Pinto Dos Santos *Department of Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInterventional radiology (IR) is a growing field but is underrepresented in most medical school curricula. We tested whether endovascular simulator training improves medical students' attitudes towards IR. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted this prospective study at two university medical centers; overall, 305 fourth-year medical students completed a 90-min IR course. The class consisted of theoretical and practical parts involving endovascular simulators. Students completed questionnaires before the course, after the theoretical and after the practical part. On a 7-point Likert scale, they rated their interest in IR, knowledge of IR, attractiveness of IR, and the likelihood to choose IR as subspecialty. We used a crossover design to prevent position-effect bias.

resultsThe seminar/simulator parts led to the improvement for all items compared with baseline: interest in IR (pre-course 5.2 vs. post-seminar/post-simulator 5.5/5.7), knowledge of IR (pre-course 2.7 vs. post-seminar/post-simulator 5.1/5.4), attractiveness of IR (pre-course 4.6 vs. post-seminar/post-simulator 4.8/5.0), and the likelihood of choosing IR as a subspecialty (pre-course 3.3 vs. post-seminar/post-simulator 3.8/4.1). Effect was significantly stronger for simulator training compared with that for seminar for all items (p < 0.05). For simulator training, subgroup analysis of students with pre-existing positive attitude showed considerable improvement regarding "interest in IR" (× 1.4), "knowledge of IR" (× 23), "attractiveness of IR" (× 2), and "likelihood to choose IR" (× 3.2) compared with pretest.

conclusionEndovascular simulator training significantly improves students' attitude towards IR regarding all items. Implementing such courses at a very early stage in the curriculum should be the first step to expose medical students to IR and push for IR. KEY POINTS: • Dedicated IR-courses have a significant positive effect on students' attitudes towards IR. • Simulator training is superior to a theoretical seminar in positively influencing students' attitudes towards IR. • Implementing dedicated IR courses in medical school might ease recruitment problems in the field.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCurriculumStudents, MedicalAcademic Medical CentersAdultEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRadiology, InterventionalSimulation TrainingSurveys and QuestionnairesAngiographyCurriculumInterventional radiologyMedical educationSimulation training

Identifiers

PMID32221683
OpenAlexW3013099030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.