Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32144691›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2020

Bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance of Pediococcus pentosaceus as a biopreservative for Listeria sp. control in ready-to-eat pork ham.

Pamela O S de Azevedo, Carlos M N Mendonça, Liane Seibert, José M Domínguez, Attilio Converti, Martin Gierus, Ricardo P S Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Nutrients · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pamela O S de AzevedoDepartment of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Technology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Carlos M N MendonçaDepartment of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Technology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Liane SeibertDepartment of Animal Science, Laboratory of Ecology and Natural Grassland, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
José M DomínguezDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Science, University of Vigo (Campus Ourense), As Lagoas s/n, 32004, Ourense, Spain.
Attilio ConvertiDepartment of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Pole of Chemical Engineering, Via Opera Pia 15, 16145, Genoa, Italy.
Martin GierusDepartment of Agrobiotechnology, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Livestock Products, and Nutrition Physiology (TTE), IFA-Tulln, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
Ricardo P S OliveiraDepartment of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Technology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. rpsolive@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8590-804X

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance code 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/04385-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing demand of consumers for synthetic chemical-free foods has increased the search for natural preservatives such as bacteriocins and bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS) to give them adequate microbiological safety, sensory characteristics, and shelf life. In this study, the antimicrobial activity of BLIS produced by Pediococcus pentosaceus ATCC 43200 was compared with that of nisin. Lactobacillus sakei ATCC 15521, Listeria seeligeri NCTC 11289, Enterococcus En2052 and En2865, and Listeria monocytogenes CECT 934 and NADC 2045 exhibited larger inhibition halos in BLIS-treated than in Nisaplin-treated samples, unlike Listeria innocua NCTC 11288. In artificially contaminated ready-to-eat pork ham, BLIS was effective in inhibiting the growth of L. seeligeri NCTC 11289 for 6 days (counts from 1.74 to 0.00 log CFU/g) and ensured lower weight loss (2.7%) and lipid peroxidation (0.63 mg MDA/kg) of samples compared with the control (3.0%; 1.25 mg MDA/kg). At the same time, coloration of ham samples in terms of luminosity, redness, and yellowness as well as discoloration throughout cold storage was not influenced by BLIS or Nisaplin taken as a control. These results suggest the potential use of P. pentosaceus BLIS as a biopreservative in meat and other food processing industries.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriocinsColony Count, MicrobialFood MicrobiologyFood PreservativesFood StorageListeriaNisinPediococcus pentosaceusPork MeatAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriocinsFood PreservativesNisinAntimicrobialBLISFood spoilageMeat colorTBARS

Identifiers

PMID32144691
PMCPMC7455651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.