Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32049959›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

The environmental consequences of climate-driven agricultural frontiers.

Lee Hannah, Patrick R Roehrdanz, Krishna Bahadur K C, Evan D G Fraser, Camila I Donatti, Leonardo Saenz, Timothy Max Wright, Robert J Hijmans, Mark Mulligan, Aaron Berg and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Lee HannahThe Betty and Gordon Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America.
Patrick R RoehrdanzThe Betty and Gordon Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America.
Krishna Bahadur K CDepartment of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3966-2928
Evan D G FraserArrell Food Institute and the Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Camila I DonattiThe Betty and Gordon Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America.
Leonardo SaenzMichigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, United States of America.
Timothy Max WrightMichigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, United States of America.
Robert J HijmansDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Mark MulliganDepartment of Geography, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Aaron BergDepartment of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Arnout van SoesbergenDepartment of Geography, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Conservation International · USUniversity of Guelph · CAMichigan Technological University · USKing's College London · GBUN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre · GBUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing conditions for crops such as coffee and wine grapes are shifting to track climate change. Research on these crop responses has focused principally on impacts to food production impacts, but evidence is emerging that they may have serious environmental consequences as well. Recent research has documented potential environmental impacts of shifting cropping patterns, including impacts on water, wildlife, pollinator interaction, carbon storage and nature conservation, on national to global scales. Multiple crops will be moving in response to shifting climatic suitability, and the cumulative environmental effects of these multi-crop shifts at global scales is not known. Here we model for the first time multiple major global commodity crop suitability changes due to climate change, to estimate the impacts of new crop suitability on water, biodiversity and carbon storage. Areas that become newly suitable for one or more crops are Climate-driven Agricultural Frontiers. These frontiers cover an area equivalent to over 30% of the current agricultural land on the planet and have major potential impacts on biodiversity in tropical mountains, on water resources downstream and on carbon storage in high latitude lands. Frontier soils contain up to 177 Gt of C, which might be subject to release, which is the equivalent of over a century of current United States CO2 emissions. Watersheds serving over 1.8 billion people would be impacted by the cultivation of the climate-driven frontiers. Frontiers intersect 19 global biodiversity hotspots and the habitat of 20% of all global restricted range birds. Sound planning and management of climate-driven agricultural frontiers can therefore help reduce globally significant impacts on people, ecosystems and the climate system.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeCrops, AgriculturalBiodiversityCarbonSoilWater QualityCarbonSoil

Identifiers

PMID32049959
PMCPMC7015311
OpenAlexW3006026173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.