ArticleDyslexia (Chichester, England)2020
Early and late diagnosed dyslexia in secondary school: Performance on literacy skills and cognitive correlates.
Article in Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Linguistic and Cognitive Abilities in Children with Dyslexia: A Comparative Analysis.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025Article
- Characterization of reading processes in Brazilian adolescents: development of criteria for identifying students at risk for dyslexia.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Reduced benefit from long-term item frequency contributes to short-term memory deficits in dyslexia.Memory & cognition · 2024Article
- Early Detection of 5 Neurodevelopmental Disorders of Children and Prevention of Postnatal Depression With a Mobile Health App: Observational Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Observational
- Perceived negative consequences of dyslexia: the influence of person and environmental factors.Annals of dyslexia · 2023Article
- Repeated series learning revisited with a novel prediction on the reduced effect of item frequency in dyslexia.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A stitch in time…: Comparing late-identified, late-emerging and early-identified dyslexia.Dyslexia (Chichester, England) · 2022Article
- The Same yet Different: Oral and Silent Reading in Children and Adolescents with Dyslexia.Journal of psycholinguistic research · 2022Article
- Self-concept, creativity and developmental dyslexia in university students: Effects of age of assessment.Dyslexia (Chichester, England) · 2022Article
- What Is Going on with Visual Attention in Reading and Dyslexia? A Critical Review of Recent Studies.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Text Reading Fluency and Text Reading Comprehension Do Not Rely on the Same Abilities in University Students With and Without Dyslexia.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Effects of word length and word frequency among dyslexic, ADHD-I and typical readers.Journal of eye movement research · 2022Article
- Early and late diagnosed dyslexia in secondary school: Performance on literacy skills and cognitive correlates.Dyslexia (Chichester, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although a diagnosis of dyslexia is often made during elementary school, severe and persistent literacy difficulties of a considerable group of students are only noticed during secondary school. The question arises whether the literacy(-related) deficits of these late identified students with dyslexia differ from those of early diagnosed students. To address this question, 10th Grade Dutch secondary school students with early (n = 35) and late (n = 19) identified dyslexia and their peers with average to good literacy abilities (n = 24) were compared on literacy skills and underlying cognitive skills. At the group level, both students with an early and late diagnosis performed more poorly than their typical peers, but they did not differ from each other on (pseudo-)word reading, spelling and underlying cognitive correlates (phonemic awareness, rapid automatized naming and visual attention span). The early and late group contained comparable percentages of students performing poorly on most measures. There were, however, more students in the early group who showed deficits in phonemic awareness. Our results indicate that students with early and late diagnosed dyslexia are highly comparable. Suggestions for fitting interventions are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.