Trial reportThe British journal of dermatology2020
A head-to-head comparison of ixekizumab vs. guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 12-week efficacy, safety and speed of response from a randomized, double-blinded trial.
Trial report in The British journal of dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 168 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Tuberculosis Infection and Reactivation of Tuberculosis in Patients with Psoriasis or Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving IL-23 Inhibitors: A Systematic Literature Review.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Real-World Evidence for Ixekizumab in the Treatment of Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Axial Spondyloarthritis: Systematic Literature Review 2022-2023.Advances in therapy · 2025Pooled it
- European S2k Guideline on Chronic PruritusActa dermato-venereologica · 2025Guideline
- Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review of comparative studies on emerging psoriasis treatments: comparing biologics with biologics, small molecule inhibitors with small molecule inhibitors, and biologics with small molecule inhibitors.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Research progress on serological indices and their clinical application in rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Pooled it
- Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Risk ofInternational journal of clinical practice · 2022Pooled it
- Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Adverse Events Associated With Anti-IL-23 Agents: Clinical Evidence and Possible Mechanisms.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Pooled it
- Ixekizumab With or Without Tirzepatide in Adults With Psoriasis and Overweight or Obesity: A Phase 3b Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA dermatology · 2026Trial
- Cutaneous and systemic improvements in psoriasis patients after different biologic treatments in a real-world longitudinal prospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Association of the clinical components in the distal interphalangeal joint synovio-entheseal complex and subsequent response to ixekizumab or adalimumab in psoriatic arthritis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2024Trial
- Efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from a 64-week phase 3 study (reSURFACE 1).The Journal of dermatology · 2021Trial
- A head-to-head comparison of ixekizumab vs. guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 24-week efficacy and safety results from a randomized, double-blinded trial.The British journal of dermatology · 2021Trial
- Long-term efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from a 5-year extension of a phase 3 study (reSURFACE 1).The Journal of dermatology · 2021Trial
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Ixekizumab in Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis in the Indian Population: A Pilot Study.Indian dermatology online journal · 2026Article
- Observational
- Ixekizumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: an Italian multicentric retrospective observational study.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Observational
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with psoriasis value rapid and complete skin clearance. No head-to-head studies have focused on early responses to interleukin (IL)-17 vs. IL-23 inhibitors.
objectivesTo compare early and complete skin clearance by the IL-17A inhibitor ixekizumab vs. the IL-23p19 inhibitor guselkumab.
methodsIXORA-R, a 24-week, randomized, double-blinded study, enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis [static Physician's Global Assessment of Disease (sPGA) score of ≥ 3, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≥ 12, and ≥ 10% body surface area]. Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive the approved dose of subcutaneous ixekizumab or guselkumab. Primary end point was 100% improvement in PASI (PASI 100) at week 12. Major secondary end points included other levels of improved PASI and sPGA at different time points. Comparisons were made using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with a multiple testing strategy. Nonresponder imputation was used for missing data. After the completion of the study, the final secondary end point (PASI 100 at 24 weeks) and safety data through week 24 will be reported.
resultsIn total, 1027 patients were randomized. The primary end point PASI 100 at week 12 was met [215/520 ixekizumab (41%); 126/507 guselkumab (25%); P < 0·001]. All major secondary end points measured up to week 12 were met, including PASI 50 at week 1 and PASI 75 at week 2. Serious adverse event frequency was 3% for each group; no new safety signals were identified.
conclusionsIxekizumab was superior to guselkumab for rapidly improving signs and symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis by week 12. Adverse events were similar to previous ixekizumab and guselkumab studies. Compared with the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab, ixekizumab can offer complete skin clearance more rapidly to patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. What's already known about this topic? Patients with plaque psoriasis desire both high levels of clearance and rapid onset of treatment effects. Ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)-17A, has demonstrated greater and faster skin clearance than etanercept and ustekinumab, with consistent long-term efficacy, safety and durability of response. Clinical trial data and systematic reviews have suggested that IL-17 inhibitors can improve a patient's psoriasis more rapidly than IL-23 inhibitors. What does this study add? The head-to-head study design directly compares the efficacy and speed of response of ixekizumab and the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The primary end point was met, showing superiority of ixekizumab over guselkumab for achieving complete skin clearance at week 12. The safety profile of ixekizumab was consistent with previous studies. Ixekizumab can deliver patients complete skin clearance and improved quality of life more rapidly than guselkumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.