Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31717536›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Sing-Chung Li, Han-Pei Lin, Jung-Su Chang, Chun-Kuang Shih

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Mechanism of probiotics in the intervention of colorectal cancer: a review.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Inhibition of GABAInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Food & nutrition research · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sing-Chung LiSchool of Nutrition and Health Sciences, College of Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4244-7911
Han-Pei LinSchool of Nutrition and Health Sciences, College of Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Jung-Su ChangSchool of Nutrition and Health Sciences, College of Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8608-9349
Chun-Kuang ShihSchool of Nutrition and Health Sciences, College of Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2545-911X
Taipei Medical University · TW

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan NSC102-2313-B-038-006, MOST103-2313-B-038-004 & MOST104-2320-B-038-024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a cancer associated with chronic inflammation. Whole grains and probiotics play a protective role against CRC. Fermented grains are receiving increased attention due to their anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer activities. Our previous study found that a combination of germinated brown rice (GBR) with probiotics suppressed colorectal carcinogenesis in rats. However, the cancer-preventive effect of probiotic-fermented GBR has not been reported. This study investigated the preventive effect and possible mechanism of GBR fermented by

Indexed as

Lactobacillus acidophilusAberrant Crypt FociAnimalsApoptosisCarcinogenesisColonColonic NeoplasmsFermented FoodsMaleOryzaPrecancerous ConditionsProbioticsRatsRats, Inbred F344apoptosiscolorectal cancerfermentationgerminated brown riceinflammationLactobacillus acidophilus

Identifiers

PMID31717536
PMCPMC6893647
OpenAlexW2983333611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.