Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31612273›Full record

ReviewSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2020

Model pedagogy of human anatomy in medical education.

Raj Kumar, Rajani Singh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Anatomy Education becomes "Alive".Acta medica Philippina · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Three-Dimensional Virtual Anatomy as a New Approach for Medical Student's Learning.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Anatomy teaching by only medically qualified faculty is infeasible.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2020
    Article
  12. Model pedagogy of human anatomy in medical education.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raj KumarUttarpradesh Medical University, Saifai, Etawah, UP, India.
Rajani SinghDepartment of Anatomy, AIIMS Rishikesh, Veerbhadra Marg Pashulok, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India. nani_sahayal@rediffmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1891-4906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe falling standard of medical education evidenced by patient dissatisfaction causing rapidly heaping medico-legal cases, some of them may be due to 'anatomical ignorance' leading to tremendous concern by both clinicians and anatomists, encouraged the author to design a pedagogical model of teaching of anatomy in medical education. So, the aim of the study is to propose a suitable pedagogical model from review of literature and author's own experience and analysis.

methodsThe literature survey (online) has been carried out using the phrases, decline of anatomy, contribution of anatomy to medical education, prevalent curriculum and teaching methodology, causatives of acquisition of inadequate anatomy by medical trainees.

resultsThe literature and our own analysis highlight the deficiencies in anatomical schedule, curriculum, teaching methodologies and evaluation system in present medical education. A pedagogical model has been designed to improve the delivery and acquisition of anatomical knowledge.

conclusionsThe evolved pedagogical model of anatomy in the present study aims at sufficient delivery and acquisition of anatomical knowledge if applied, not only to curb failure cases and, consequently, litigations but also to boost the confidence of trainees, patients and society on health care system.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCurriculumModels, EducationalAnatomyEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansMedical ErrorsPatient SatisfactionStudents, MedicalTeachingAnatomyCurriculumMedical educationPedagogy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.