SynthesisClinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993)2020

Liraglutide reduces systolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Di Zhao, Hui Liu, Pingshuan Dong

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993), 2020. The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map: it supports the treatment in 1. Cited by 6 papers.

1number the graph read from it
1cell of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
-7.260 · no effect
Blood pressurefavours the treatment · against placebo · hypertension, obesityfeeds one cell of the map
Δ -5.39-7.26 to -3.51
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day reduced systolic blood pressure (weighted mean differences -5.39 (95% confidence interval, -7.26, -3.51) mm Hg,

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

GLP-1 receptor agonists×blood pressure

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

9 readable studies in this cell: 3 favour the treatment, 5 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 2 families support, 1 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT00676338820 enrolled · 2008
Δ 0.36-1.02 to 1.73
NCT00781937422 enrolled · 2008
Treatment Contrast -2.72-4.69 to -0.76
NCT02492763176 enrolled · 2015
Δ -1.10-6.20 to 4.10
NCT04019197108 enrolled · 2019
β coefficient -0.05-0.10 to -0.01
NCT0488111060 enrolled · 2021
Δ -0.00-5.80 to 5.80

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Combination ofNutrients · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Di ZhaoDivision of Hypertension, The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Hui LiuDivision of Endocrinology, Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Luoyang, China.
Pingshuan DongDivision of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology · CNLuoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

The antidiabetic effect of liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus has been explored in several trials. We performed this meta-analysis determining the effects of liraglutide on blood pressure in these patients. Three electronic databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central) were searched for all published articles evaluating the effects of liraglutide on blood pressure in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Total 968 patients were included in 10 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with a follow-up of 16 ± 9 weeks. Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day reduced systolic blood pressure (weighted mean differences -5.39 (95% confidence interval, -7.26, -3.51) mm Hg,

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2HypertensionBlood PressureBody WeightHumansHypoglycemic AgentsLiraglutideRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHypoglycemic AgentsLiraglutideblood pressureDiabetes mellitusliraglutidemeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID31610701
OpenAlexW2980568931

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.