Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31294180›Full record

ReviewAIMS microbiology2017

Potential applications of plant probiotic microorganisms in agriculture and forestry.

Luciana Porto de Souza Vandenberghe, Lina Marcela Blandon Garcia, Cristine Rodrigues, Marcela Cândido Camara, Gilberto Vinícius de Melo Pereira, Juliana de Oliveira, Carlos Ricardo Soccol

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIMS microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Larval Frass ofInsects · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Metagenomic analysis revealed the potential of lactic acid bacteria in improving natural saline-alkali land.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Characterization of Antagonistic BacteriaPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Genomic Analysis of aAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luciana Porto de Souza VandenbergheBioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology Department, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba-PR, Brazil.
Lina Marcela Blandon GarciaInstituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (INVEMAR), Santa Marta, Colombia.
Cristine RodriguesBioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology Department, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba-PR, Brazil.
Marcela Cândido CamaraBioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology Department, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba-PR, Brazil.
Gilberto Vinícius de Melo PereiraBioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology Department, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba-PR, Brazil.
Juliana de OliveiraBioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology Department, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba-PR, Brazil.
Carlos Ricardo SoccolBioprocess Engineering and Biotechnology Department, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba-PR, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agriculture producers, pushed by the need for high productivity, have stimulated the intensive use of pesticides and fertilizers. Unfortunately, negative effects on water, soil, and human and animal health have appeared as a consequence of this indiscriminate practice. Plant probiotic microorganisms (PPM), also known as bioprotectants, biocontrollers, biofertilizers, or biostimulants, are beneficial microorganisms that offer a promising alternative and reduce health and environmental problems. These microorganisms are involved in either a symbiotic or free-living association with plants and act in different ways, sometimes with specific functions, to achieve satisfactory plant development. This review deals with PPM presentation and their description and function in different applications. PPM includes the plant growth promoters (PGP) group, which contain bacteria and fungi that stimulate plant growth through different mechanisms. Soil microflora mediate many biogeochemical processes. The use of plant probiotics as an alternative soil fertilization source has been the focus of several studies; their use in agriculture improves nutrient supply and conserves field management and causes no adverse effects. The species related to organic matter and pollutant biodegradation in soil and abiotic stress tolerance are then presented. As an important way to understand not only the ecological role of PPM and their interaction with plants but also the biotechnological application of these cultures to crop management, two main approaches are elucidated: the culture-dependent approach where the microorganisms contained in the plant material are isolated by culturing and are identified by a combination of phenotypic and molecular methods; and the culture-independent approach where microorganisms are detected without cultivating them, based on extraction and analyses of DNA. These methods combine to give a thorough knowledge of the microbiology of the studied environment.

Indexed as

biocontrollersbiofertilizersbioprotectantsbiostimulantsplant growth promotersplant probiotic microorganismssoil microflora

Identifiers

PMID31294180
PMCPMC6604986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.