Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31292006›Full record

Trial reportBMC research notes2019

Using Kirkpatrick's model to measure the effect of a new teaching and learning methods workshop for health care staff.

Mohammad Reza Heydari, Fatemeh Taghva, Mitra Amini, Somayeh Delavari

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC research notes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad Reza HeydariHIV/AIDS Research Center, Institute of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Fatemeh TaghvaShohaday-Enghelab Health Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mitra AminiClinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. mitraamini51@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7332-5151
Somayeh DelavariCenter for Educational Research in Medical Sciences (CERMS), Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study is designed to evaluate the effect of a workshop about new teaching and learning methods on the response, knowledge, and behavior of healthcare staff working a large city healthcare center.

resultsKirkpatrick's program evaluation model showed that the workshop on new teaching and learning methods significantly improved the healthcare staff's satisfaction about the teaching environment of workshops, their knowledge about new teaching and learning methods and their behavior in performing workshops for teaching people. It is recommended that this teaching and learning methods workshop should be considered in educational programs for healthcare staff. Trial registration Trial registration number: IRCT20180619040150N1 approved by Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials at 2018-07-27.

Indexed as

LearningModels, EducationalTeachingCurriculumFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationKirkpatrick’s modelTeaching methodsWorkshop

Identifiers

PMID31292006
PMCPMC6617554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.