Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31092545›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Physiological and Behavioral Responses to Optogenetic Stimulation of PKD2L1

Courtney E Wilson, Aurelie Vandenbeuch, Sue C Kinnamon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Polycystin Channel Complexes.Annual review of physiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Recent Advances in Understanding Peripheral Taste Decoding I: 2010 to 2020.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Review
  7. Sour taste: receptors, cells and circuits.Current opinion in physiology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Taste transduction and channel synapses in taste buds.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Courtney E WilsonDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045 Courtney.wilson@ucdenver.edu.
Aurelie VandenbeuchDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045.
Sue C KinnamonDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045.

Funding

Purinergic signaling in taste budsR01DC012555 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KINNAMON, SUE C. · 2012 to 2021
$3.9M
NEUROSCIENCE TRAINING GRANTT32HD041697 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI RESTREPO, DIEGO · 2001 to 2015
$2.4M
Neuroscience Training GrantT32NS099042 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Nidia Calero, GIDON S FELSEN · 2016 to 2026
$2.1M
Shedding Light on Type III Taste Cell FunctionF31DC015700 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI WILSON, COURTNEY ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2017
$62k
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD041697NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC015700NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012555NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS099042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type III taste cells in mammalian taste buds are implicated in the detection and communication of sour and some salty stimuli, as well as carbonation and water. With this variety of proposed roles, it is unclear what information activated type III cells are communicating to the CNS. To better elucidate the role of type III cells in the taste bud, we use a type III cell-specific protein (polycystic kidney disease 2-like 1) to drive Cre-dependent expression of light-sensitive channelrhodopsin (Ai32) in mouse type III taste cells. Activation of these cells with light produces a taste nerve response in both the chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerves, and elicits a slight but significant aversion in two-bottle preference tests in both male and female mice. Unlike previous reports (Zocchi et al., 2017), our mice did not react to blue light stimulation with sustained drinking responses. These data suggest that type III cells are capable of communicating the presence of aversive stimuli in the oral cavity, which is in line with their responsiveness to sour and high concentrations of salt stimuli.

Indexed as

Calcium ChannelsOptogeneticsReceptors, Cell SurfaceAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChannelrhodopsinsChoice BehaviorChorda Tympani NerveFemaleGlossopharyngeal NerveLightMaleMiceTasteTaste BudsTaste PerceptionCalcium ChannelsChannelrhodopsinsPkd2l1 protein, mouseReceptors, Cell Surfaceoptogeneticstastetype III taste cells

Identifiers

PMID31092545
PMCPMC6520643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.