Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31052522›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Race/Ethnicity, Enrichment/Fortification, and Dietary Supplementation in the U.S. Population, NHANES 2009⁻2012.

Angela M Malek, Jill C Newman, Kelly J Hunt, Bernadette P Marriott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angela M MalekDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. malek@musc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5691-5347
Jill C NewmanDepartment of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. newmanji@musc.edu.
Kelly J HuntDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. huntke@musc.edu.
Bernadette P MarriottDepartments of Medicine and Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. marriobp@musc.edu.

Funding

International Life Sciences Institute North America NA-MEDUNIVSCAROLINA-20170317North American branch of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI North America) NA-MEDUNIVSCAROLINA-20170317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States (U.S.), food fortification and/or enrichment and dietary supplement (DS) use impacts nutrient intakes. Our aim was to examine race/ethnicity and income (Poverty Income Ratio, PIR) differences in meeting the Dietary Reference Intakes based on estimated dietary intakes among the U.S. population age ≥2 years (

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsEthnicityFood, FortifiedNutrition SurveysRace FactorsHumansIncomeMicronutrientsNutritional RequirementsNutritional StatusRecommended Dietary AllowancesUnited StatesMicronutrientsdietary reference intakesocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID31052522
PMCPMC6567168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.