Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31016570›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2019

Application of nisin as biopreservative of pork meat by dipping and spraying methods.

Pamela Oliveira de Souza de Azevedo, Attilio Converti, Martin Gierus, Ricardo Pinheiro de Souza Oliveira

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Antimicrobial Activity of Peptides Produced byAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance of Pediococcus pentosaceus as a biopreservative for Listeria sp. control in ready-to-eat pork ham.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pamela Oliveira de Souza de AzevedoDepartment of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Technology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Attilio ConvertiDepartment of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Pole of Chemical Engineering, Via Opera Pia 15, 16145, Genoa, Italy.
Martin GierusDepartment of Agrobiotechnology, Institute of Animal Nutrition, Livestock Products, and Nutrition Physiology (TTE), IFA-Tulln, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
Ricardo Pinheiro de Souza OliveiraDepartment of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Technology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. rpsolive@usp.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparison between dipping and spraying methods to inhibit bacterial growth on artificially contaminated pork meat showed greater effectiveness of the latter method during the whole low-temperature one-week storage of product. These results suggest that the spraying method could be successful in directly applying antimicrobials to food products.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFood MicrobiologyFood PackagingFood PreservationFood PreservativesMeat ProductsNisinRed MeatSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsFood PreservativesNisinDipping methodMeat preservationNatural antimicrobialSpraying method

Identifiers

PMID31016570
PMCPMC6863299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.