Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31007738›Full record

ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019

Insulin use and fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of 138,690 patients.

Yuxian Zhang, Qiuying Chen, Yuying Liang, Yuhao Dong, Xiaokai Mo, Lu Zhang, Bin Zhang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Association between combined treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors and metformin for type 2 diabetes mellitus on fracture risk: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020 · on this map
    Pooled it
  4. Adjusting fracture probability according to duration of diabetes: the Manitoba BMD Registry.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Diabetes and bone.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. To do one and to get more: Part I. Diabetes and bone.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Vertebral Fracture Risk.Current osteoporosis reports · 2021
    Review
  18. Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Bone Health.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  19. Bone health in diabetes and prediabetes.World journal of diabetes · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuxian ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Qiuying ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510627, P.R. China.
Yuying LiangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Yuhao DongDepartment of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Xiaokai MoDepartment of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Lu ZhangDepartment of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China.
Bin ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510627, P.R. China.
Southern Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been reported to have an enhanced risk of bone fracture, however the association between insulin treatment and risk of fracture in patients with T2DM remains to be fully elucidated. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to examine the possible association between insulin treatment and risk of fracture in patients with T2DM. Relevant studies published prior to and including April 2018 were identified by literature searches in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. A meta-analysis was performed, which included relevant trials of patients with T2DM comparing insulin to oral anti-diabetic drugs. The combined effect was expressed as a pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), using a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed to consolidate the results. A total of 7 studies comprising 138,690 patients were eligible for inclusion in the present meta-analysis. After exclusion of one study that introduced major heterogeneity, treatment with, insulin was associated with a significantly increased risk of fracture among patients with T2DM (RR=1.24, 95% CI, 1.07-1.44; P=0.004). Subgroup analysis by sex indicated that the RR for men was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.76-1.44, P=0.801) and that for women was 1.22 (95% CI, 0.92-1.62, P=0.175). Subgroup analysis by fracture site indicated that the RR for hip was 1.18 (95% CI, 0.83-1.68, P=0.363), that for vertebrae was 1.28 (95% CI, 0.90-1.81, P=0.169) and that for non-vertebrae was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.80-1.41, P=0.686). Subgroup analysis by study design suggested that the RR for prospective and retrospective studies was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.06-1.71, P=0.014) and 1.16 (95% CI, 0.99-1.35, P=0.059), respectively. Subgroup analysis by region indicated that the RR for Europe was 1.16 (95% CI, 0.91-1.48, P=0.220), that for North America was 1.24 (95% CI, 0.81-1.90, P=0.333) and that for Asia was 1.34 (95% CI, 0.91-1.98, P=0.141). In conclusion, treatment with insulin increased the risk of fractures among patients with T2DM compared with oral anti-diabetic drugs; however, the association was influenced by various factors, including sex, fracture site, study design and geographical region.

Indexed as

fractureinsulinmeta-analysistype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31007738
PMCPMC6468519
OpenAlexW2928115423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.