Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30936886›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2019

Potential of

Aman Kumar, Payal Kapoor, Venkatesh Chunduri, Saloni Sharma, Monika Garg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Perspectives on the utilization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Molecular Characterization and Marker Development of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Disruption ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aman KumarNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India.
Payal KapoorNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India.
Venkatesh ChunduriNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India.
Saloni SharmaNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India.
Monika GargNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute, Mohali, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wheat is one of the most important staple crops in the world and good source of calories and nutrition. Its flour and dough have unique physical properties and can be processed to make unique products like bread, cakes, biscuits, pasta, noodles etc., which is not possible from other staple crops. Due to domestication, the genetic variability of the genes coding for different economically important traits in wheat is narrow. This genetic variability can be increased by utilizing its wild relatives. Its closest relative, genus

Indexed as

Aegilopsdietary fibergliadinsgluteninsgrain micronutrientsphytochemicalspuroindolins

Identifiers

PMID30936886
PMCPMC6431632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.