Trial reportJAMA network open2019

Assessment of Vascular Event Prevention and Cognitive Function Among Older Adults With Preexisting Vascular Disease or Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of 3 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Alison Offer, Matthew Arnold, Robert Clarke, Derrick Bennett, Louise Bowman, Richard Bulbulia, Richard Haynes, Jing Li, Jemma C Hopewell, Martin Landray and 4 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map, but it casts no vote: it is a later paper about NCT00461630, whose primary report (PMID 25014686) speaks for the trial. An erratum has been issued. It reports registered trial NCT00461630. Cited by 12 papers.

2numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
-0.371.060 · no effect
Quality of life & behaviourno clear difference · against placebo · t2d, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
Δ 0.35-0.37 to 1.06P = .35
The directly observed effect on cognitive function of randomization to statin therapy in HPS (which would reflect not only any effects mediated via event reductions but any other effects of a statin on cognition, and which can only be assessed among those completing cognitive assessment) was a difference of 0.35 (95% CI, -0.37 to 1.06; P = .35) years of cognitive aging (deriving from a difference of 0.014 [95% CI, -0.015 to 0.043] in the z score).

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

Cardiovascular eventscomparator not stated · t2d, ascvdfeeds one cell of the map
reduction -0.15-0.19 to -0.11
In HPS, randomization to statin therapy for 5 years resulted in 2.0% of survivors avoiding a nonfatal stroke or transient ischemic attack and 2.4% avoiding a nonfatal cardiac event, which yielded an expected reduction in cognitive aging of 0.15 (95% CI, 0.11-0.19) years.

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Statins×quality of life & behaviour

Does not voteOpen on the map →What to test next →

3 readable studies in this cell: 0 favour the treatment, 3 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.25no deciding trial · 0 families support, 0 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

Statins×cardiovascular events

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

29 readable studies in this cell: 18 favour the treatment, 10 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.86replicated · 12 families support, 2 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
HR 0.750.64 to 0.88
NCT023442907,769 enrolled · 2015
HR 0.640.48 to 0.84
HR 0.880.69 to 1.11
NCT03944512102 enrolled · 2019
RR 0.670.37 to 1.19

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00461630 phase3completed

A Randomized Trial of the Long-term Clinical Effects of Raising HDL Cholesterol With Extended Release Niacin/Laropiprant

Ran2007Enrolled25,673Registered outcomes5Posted comparisons0ConditionsCardiovascular Disease, Coronary Heart Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Peripheral Arterial DiseaseArmsER niacin/laropiprant, ezetimibe/simvastatin, simvastatin
Open the trial in the graph
5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Typographical Error in Title.JAMA network open · 2019
    Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alison OfferClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Matthew ArnoldClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Robert ClarkeClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Derrick BennettClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Louise BowmanClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Richard BulbuliaClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Richard HaynesClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jing LiNational Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jemma C HopewellClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Martin LandrayClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jane ArmitageClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rory CollinsClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sarah ParishClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Heart Protection Study (HPS), Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine (SEARCH), and Treatment of HDL (High-Density Lipoprotein) to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events (HPS2-THRIVE) Collaborative Grou

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/1996001/9454British Heart Foundation FS/14/55/30806British Heart Foundation SP/08/010/25939British Heart Foundation SP/14/3/31114Medical Research Council MC_U137686853Medical Research Council MC_UU_12026/5Medical Research Council MRC_MC_U137686853
8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

Importance: Acquisition of reliable randomized clinical trial evidence of the effects of cardiovascular interventions on cognitive decline is a priority. Objectives: To estimate the association of cognitive aging with the avoidance of vascular events in cardiovascular intervention trials and understand whether reports of nonsignificant results exclude worthwhile benefit. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials in participants with preexisting occlusive vascular disease or diabetes included survivors to final in-trial follow-up in the Heart Protection Study (HPS), Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine (SEARCH), and Treatment of HDL (High-Density Lipoprotein) to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events (HPS2-THRIVE) trials of lipid modification for prevention of cardiovascular events. Data were collected from February 1994 through January 2013 and analyzed from January 2015 through December 2018. Exposures: Incident vascular events and diabetes and statin therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cognitive function was assessed at the end of a mean (SD) of 4.9 (1.5) years of follow-up using a 14-item verbal test. Associations of the incidence of vascular events and new-onset diabetes during the trials, with cognitive function at final in-trial follow-up were estimated and expressed as years of cognitive aging (using the association of the score with age >60 years). The benefit on cognitive aging mediated through the effects of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels on events was estimated by applying these findings to nonfatal event differences observed with statin therapy in the HPS trial. Results: Among 45 029 participants undergoing cognitive assessment, mean (SD) age was 67.9 (8.0) years; 80.7% were men. Incident stroke (n = 1197) was associated with 7.1 (95% CI, 5.7-8.5) years of cognitive aging; incident transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and new-onset diabetes were associated with 1 to 2 years of cognitive aging. In HPS, randomization to statin therapy for 5 years resulted in 2.0% of survivors avoiding a nonfatal stroke or transient ischemic attack and 2.4% avoiding a nonfatal cardiac event, which yielded an expected reduction in cognitive aging of 0.15 (95% CI, 0.11-0.19) years. With 15 926 participants undergoing cognitive assessment, HPS had 80% power to detect a 1-year (ie, 20% during the 5 years) difference in cognitive aging. Conclusions and Relevance: The expected cognitive benefits of the effects of preventive therapies on cardiovascular events during even the largest randomized clinical trials may have been too small to be detectable. Hence, nonsignificant findings may not provide good evidence of a lack of worthwhile benefit on cognitive function with prolonged use of such therapies. Trial Registration: isrctn.com and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: ISRCTN48489393, ISRCTN74348595, and NCT00461630.

Indexed as

Cognitive AgingAgedCognitionDiabetes MellitusFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIncidenceIntelligence TestsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionOutcome Assessment, Health CareStrokeVascular DiseasesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID30821829
PMCPMC6484650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.