Trial reportJAMA network open2019
Assessment of Vascular Event Prevention and Cognitive Function Among Older Adults With Preexisting Vascular Disease or Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of 3 Randomized Clinical Trials.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map, but it casts no vote: it is a later paper about NCT00461630, whose primary report (PMID 25014686) speaks for the trial. An erratum has been issued. It reports registered trial NCT00461630. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The directly observed effect on cognitive function of randomization to statin therapy in HPS (which would reflect not only any effects mediated via event reductions but any other effects of a statin on cognition, and which can only be assessed among those completing cognitive assessment) was a difference of 0.35 (95% CI, -0.37 to 1.06; P = .35) years of cognitive aging (deriving from a difference of 0.014 [95% CI, -0.015 to 0.043] in the z score).
Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against
In HPS, randomization to statin therapy for 5 years resulted in 2.0% of survivors avoiding a nonfatal stroke or transient ischemic attack and 2.4% avoiding a nonfatal cardiac event, which yielded an expected reduction in cognitive aging of 0.15 (95% CI, 0.11-0.19) years.
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
Statins×quality of life & behaviour
Does not voteOpen on the map →What to test next →3 readable studies in this cell: 0 favour the treatment, 3 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
Statins×cardiovascular events
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →29 readable studies in this cell: 18 favour the treatment, 10 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Trial of the Long-term Clinical Effects of Raising HDL Cholesterol With Extended Release Niacin/Laropiprant
Open the trial in the graphWho cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of aspirin on dementia and cognitive function in diabetic patients: the ASCEND trial.European heart journal · 2022Trial
- Cognitive Safety and Outcomes of Pharmacological Management in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- 2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- Hypothetical Interventions on Cardiovascular Health Metrics for Abnormal Cognitive Aging: An Application of the Parametric g-formula in the CLHLS Cohort Study with 12 Years Follow-Up.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024Article
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2023Review
- Weight loss in a cardiovascular trial population identifies people at future risk of dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Statins and cognition: Modifying factors and possible underlying mechanisms.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Review
- Long-Term Incidence of Stroke and Dementia in ASCOT.Stroke · 2021Article
- Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction Exacerbates Neuroinflammation via the TLR4 Pathway in Mice With Heart Failure.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Are large simple trials for dementia prevention possible?Age and ageing · 2020Article
- Typographical Error in Title.JAMA network open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
Importance: Acquisition of reliable randomized clinical trial evidence of the effects of cardiovascular interventions on cognitive decline is a priority. Objectives: To estimate the association of cognitive aging with the avoidance of vascular events in cardiovascular intervention trials and understand whether reports of nonsignificant results exclude worthwhile benefit. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials in participants with preexisting occlusive vascular disease or diabetes included survivors to final in-trial follow-up in the Heart Protection Study (HPS), Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine (SEARCH), and Treatment of HDL (High-Density Lipoprotein) to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events (HPS2-THRIVE) trials of lipid modification for prevention of cardiovascular events. Data were collected from February 1994 through January 2013 and analyzed from January 2015 through December 2018. Exposures: Incident vascular events and diabetes and statin therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cognitive function was assessed at the end of a mean (SD) of 4.9 (1.5) years of follow-up using a 14-item verbal test. Associations of the incidence of vascular events and new-onset diabetes during the trials, with cognitive function at final in-trial follow-up were estimated and expressed as years of cognitive aging (using the association of the score with age >60 years). The benefit on cognitive aging mediated through the effects of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels on events was estimated by applying these findings to nonfatal event differences observed with statin therapy in the HPS trial. Results: Among 45 029 participants undergoing cognitive assessment, mean (SD) age was 67.9 (8.0) years; 80.7% were men. Incident stroke (n = 1197) was associated with 7.1 (95% CI, 5.7-8.5) years of cognitive aging; incident transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and new-onset diabetes were associated with 1 to 2 years of cognitive aging. In HPS, randomization to statin therapy for 5 years resulted in 2.0% of survivors avoiding a nonfatal stroke or transient ischemic attack and 2.4% avoiding a nonfatal cardiac event, which yielded an expected reduction in cognitive aging of 0.15 (95% CI, 0.11-0.19) years. With 15 926 participants undergoing cognitive assessment, HPS had 80% power to detect a 1-year (ie, 20% during the 5 years) difference in cognitive aging. Conclusions and Relevance: The expected cognitive benefits of the effects of preventive therapies on cardiovascular events during even the largest randomized clinical trials may have been too small to be detectable. Hence, nonsignificant findings may not provide good evidence of a lack of worthwhile benefit on cognitive function with prolonged use of such therapies. Trial Registration: isrctn.com and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: ISRCTN48489393, ISRCTN74348595, and NCT00461630.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.