Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30249238›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2018

E-learning for self-management support: introducing blended learning for graduate students - a cohort study.

Virginia Munro, Andrea Morello, Candice Oster, Christine Redmond, Anna Vnuk, Sheila Lennon, Sharon Lawn

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Efficacy of Blended Learning in a Pediatric Spine Deformity Management Program in Sub-Saharan Africa.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Using mobile multimedia platforms in teaching dental diagnosis.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Virginia MunroCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia. ginnymunro1308@gmail.com.
Andrea MorelloFlinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Flinders University, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
Candice OsterFlinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Flinders University, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
Christine RedmondDiscipline of Physiotherapy, School of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
Anna VnukCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
Sheila LennonDiscipline of Physiotherapy, School of Nursing & Health Sciences, Flinders University, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
Sharon LawnFlinders Human Behaviour & Health Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Flinders University, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundE-learning allows delivery of education in many diverse settings and researchers have demonstrated it can be as effective as learning conducted in traditional face-to-face settings. However, there are particular practices and skills needed in the area of providing patient self-management support (SMS), that may not be achievable online. The aim of this study was to compare three approaches in the training of university students regarding the preparation of a Chronic Condition Self-Management Care Plan: 1) traditional face-to-face delivery of SMS training, 2) an e-learning approach and 3) a blended approach (combining e-learning and face-to-face teaching).

methodsGraduate entry physiotherapy students and medical students at Flinders University were recruited. Depending on the cohort, students were either exposed to traditional face-to-face training, e-learning or a blended model. Outcomes were compared between the three groups. We measured adherence to care plan processes in the preparation of an assessment piece using the Flinders Program Chronic Care Self Management tools. A total of 183 care plans were included (102 traditional, 52 blended, 29 e-learning,). All students submitted the Flinders Program Chronic Care Plan for university assessment and these were later assessed for quality by researchers. The submission was also assigned a consumer engagement score and a global competence score as these are integral to successful delivery of SMS and represent the patient perspective.

resultsThe blended group performed significantly better than the traditional group in quality use of the Flinders Program tools: Problem and Goals (P < 0.0001). They also performed significantly better in the total care plan score (P < 0.0001) and engagement score (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the groups for the Partners in Health tool.

conclusionsIn this pilot study, the blended learning model was a more effective method for teaching self-management skills than the traditional group, as assessed in the development of a chronic condition self-management care plan. We anticipate that future research with identical groups of students would yield similar results but in the meantime, academics can have confidence that blended learning is at least as effective as traditional learning methods.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesEducation, GraduateHumansPhysical Therapy SpecialtySchools, Health OccupationsSelf-ManagementSouth AustraliaStudents, MedicalBlended learningChronic careE-learningPerson-centred careSelf-managementSelf-management supportVirtual learning

Identifiers

PMID30249238
PMCPMC6154791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.