ArticleBMC medical education2018
E-learning for self-management support: introducing blended learning for graduate students - a cohort study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a Novel e-Learning Program for Physiotherapists to Manage Knee Osteoarthritis via Telehealth: Qualitative Study Nested in the PEAK (Physiotherapy Exercise and Physical Activity for Knee Osteoarthritis) Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Trial
- Overview of styles, content, learning effects and attitudes of students towards digitally enhanced physiotherapy education - a scoping review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Physiotherapy students' academic performance and satisfaction after following a chest physiotherapy course in hybrid mode: a case-control study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Developing a national undergraduate medical education pain management and substance use disorder curriculum to address the opioid crisis: a program evaluation pilot study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- The Efficacy of Blended Learning in a Pediatric Spine Deformity Management Program in Sub-Saharan Africa.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2023Article
- Undergraduate medical education amid COVID-19: a qualitative analysis of enablers and barriers to acquiring competencies in distant learning using focus groups.Medical education online · 2021Article
- The academic experience in distance (virtual) rounding and education of emergency surgery during COVID-19 pandemic.Surgery open science · 2021Article
- Blended Learning Is a Feasible and Effective Tool for Basic Pediatric Spinal Deformity Training.Global spine journal · 2021Article
- Effectiveness of face-to-face, blended and e-learning in teaching the application of local anaesthesia: a randomised study.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Article
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Education in a Hybrid Learning Environment: Reimagining the Possibilities and Navigating a "New Normal".Physical therapy · 2020Article
- Using mobile multimedia platforms in teaching dental diagnosis.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2020Article
- Should the PBL tutor be present? A cross-sectional study of group effectiveness in synchronous and asynchronous settings.BMC medical education · 2020Article
- Improving Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Knowledge and Skills to Develop Health Research Capacity in Kenya.Online journal of public health informatics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundE-learning allows delivery of education in many diverse settings and researchers have demonstrated it can be as effective as learning conducted in traditional face-to-face settings. However, there are particular practices and skills needed in the area of providing patient self-management support (SMS), that may not be achievable online. The aim of this study was to compare three approaches in the training of university students regarding the preparation of a Chronic Condition Self-Management Care Plan: 1) traditional face-to-face delivery of SMS training, 2) an e-learning approach and 3) a blended approach (combining e-learning and face-to-face teaching).
methodsGraduate entry physiotherapy students and medical students at Flinders University were recruited. Depending on the cohort, students were either exposed to traditional face-to-face training, e-learning or a blended model. Outcomes were compared between the three groups. We measured adherence to care plan processes in the preparation of an assessment piece using the Flinders Program Chronic Care Self Management tools. A total of 183 care plans were included (102 traditional, 52 blended, 29 e-learning,). All students submitted the Flinders Program Chronic Care Plan for university assessment and these were later assessed for quality by researchers. The submission was also assigned a consumer engagement score and a global competence score as these are integral to successful delivery of SMS and represent the patient perspective.
resultsThe blended group performed significantly better than the traditional group in quality use of the Flinders Program tools: Problem and Goals (P < 0.0001). They also performed significantly better in the total care plan score (P < 0.0001) and engagement score (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the groups for the Partners in Health tool.
conclusionsIn this pilot study, the blended learning model was a more effective method for teaching self-management skills than the traditional group, as assessed in the development of a chronic condition self-management care plan. We anticipate that future research with identical groups of students would yield similar results but in the meantime, academics can have confidence that blended learning is at least as effective as traditional learning methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.