Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30173314›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2018

Testing alternative regression models to predict utilities: mapping the QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D-5L and the SF-6D.

Admassu N Lamu, Jan Abel Olsen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ H&N35 to the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D for papillary thyroid carcinoma.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  6. Health-related quality of life among cancer survivors: pre-existing chronic conditions are to be given priority.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mapping the Peds QLFrontiers in public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Mapping the Haem-A-QoL to the EQ-5D-5L in patients with hemophilia.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Does linear equating improve prediction in mapping? Crosswalking MacNew onto EQ-5D-5L value sets.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Mapping the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire onto the Child Health Utility 9D in a large study of children.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Admassu N LamuDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, 9037, Tromsø, Norway. admassu.n.lamu@uit.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6638-421X
Jan Abel OlsenDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Tromsø, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study was to compare alternative statistical techniques to find the best approach for converting QLQ-C30 scores onto EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D utilities, and to estimate the mapping algorithms that best predict these health state utilities.

methods772 cancer patients described their health along the cancer-specific instrument (QLQ-C30) and two generic preference-based instruments (EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D). Seven alternative regression models were applied: ordinary least squares, generalized linear model, extended estimating equations (EEE), fractional regression model, beta binomial (BB) regression, logistic quantile regression and censored least absolute deviation. Normalized mean absolute error (NMAE), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), r-squared (r

resultsIn predicting EQ-5D-5L utilities, the BB regression performed best. It gave better predictive accuracy in terms of all criteria in the full sample, as well as in the validation sample. In predicting SF-6D, the EEE performed best. It outperformed in all criteria: NRMSE = 0.1004, NMAE = 0.0798, CCC = 0.842 and r

conclusionsWhen only QLQ-C30 data are available, mapping provides an alternative approach to obtain health state utility data for use in cost-effectiveness analyses. Among seven alternative regression models, the BB and the EEE gave the most accurate predictions for EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D, respectively.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesEQ-5D-5LMappingQALYsQLQ-C30Regression modelsSF-6D

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.