Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30109837›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2018

Nutritional quality of meals offered to children (kids' meals) at chain restaurants in Japan.

Ken Uechi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ken UechiDivision of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Health Science,Toho University,2-2-1 Miyama,Funabashi,Chiba 274-8510,Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the nutritional quality, particularly the fat and salt contents, of meals offered to children (kids' meals) at chain restaurants in Japan.

designA web-based content analysis was conducted to evaluate the type of restaurant, type of meal, incentives, health claims and nutrition data of kids' meals. The nutritional appropriateness of kids' meals was assessed with the Standard for the School Lunch Program, which regulates energy (≤2218 kJ), protein (20-30 g), fat (≤30 % of energy (E%)) and salt (<2 g) contents of the school lunch in Japan. Linear mixed models were employed for evaluating the relationship between the characteristics of kids' meals and their fat (E%) or salt (g) content.

settingRestaurant websites providing nutritional data of kids' meals in Japan. SUBJECTS: A total of 438 kids' meals offered by forty-two chain restaurant brands from across twenty food-service companies.

resultsOverall, 58·9, 40·6 and 34·5 % of the kids' meals were determined to be appropriate regarding their energy (≤2218 kJ), fat (≤30 E%) and salt content (<2 g). In addition, 15·5 % of kids' meals met the multiple standards of energy, fat and salt contents. 'Japanese-style' (restaurant-level characteristic) was associated with a decrease in the fat E% of kids' meals (β=-6·2; 95 % CI -11·0, -1·4) and an increase in the salt content (β=0·7; 95 % CI 0·06, 1·3).

conclusionsThe characteristics of the restaurant-served kids' meals in Japan were high fat E% and high salt content from different cultural contexts of the Western and the Japanese diet.

Indexed as

CommerceEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorNutritive ValueRestaurantsChildDietDietary FatsFast FoodsFood LabelingHumansInternetJapanLunchMealsNutritional RequirementsDietary FatsSodium Chloride, DietaryChildrenFast foodFatJapanRestaurantSodium

Identifiers

PMID30109837
PMCPMC10260827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.