Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29998740›Full record

Trial reportAutism : the international journal of research and practice2019

The impact of implementation support on the use of a social engagement intervention for children with autism in public schools.

Jill Locke, Wendy Shih, Christina D Kang-Yi, Julie Caramanico, Travis Shingledecker, Jordan Gibson, Lindsay Frederick, David S Mandell

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Examining the use of implementation science in autism intervention research: A scoping review.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jill Locke1 University of Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1445-8509
Wendy Shih2 Loma Linda University, USA.
Christina D Kang-Yi3 University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Julie Caramanico3 University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Travis Shingledecker3 University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Jordan Gibson3 University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Lindsay Frederick1 University of Washington, USA.
David S Mandell3 University of Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Staff and School Factors Affecting Implementation of ASD Interventions in SchoolsK01MH100199 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LOCKE, JILL J · 2014 to 2017
$698k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH100199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several interventions have demonstrated efficacy in improving social outcomes for children with autism; however, few have been successfully implemented in schools. This study compared two implementation strategies to improve the use of a social engagement intervention for children with autism in public schools. In total, 31 children with autism in grades K-5 and 28 school personnel participated in a randomized controlled trial. Schools were randomized to (1) training in Remaking Recess, a social engagement intervention, or (2) training in Remaking Recess with implementation support. Linear regression with random effects was used to test the intervention effects on implementation fidelity and social outcomes (peer engagement, social network inclusion, and friendship nominations). In both groups, implementation fidelity improved after training but remained low. Children in the Remaking Recess with implementation support condition had significantly higher social network inclusion and received more friendship nominations than children in the Remaking Recess-only condition (p = 0.03). Children in both groups experienced reduced solitary engagement (p < 0.001) and increased joint engagement (p < 0.001). The results suggest that implementation supports may have an effect on outcomes above and beyond the intervention, and that further research is needed into the active intervention mechanisms.

Indexed as

SchoolsSocial ParticipationAdultAutistic DisorderCapacity BuildingChildEducational PersonnelFemaleFriendsHumansImplementation ScienceLinear ModelsMaleMentoringOrganizational CulturePeer Groupautism spectrum disorderimplementationschoolsocial engagement intervention

Identifiers

PMID29998740
PMCPMC6312760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.