Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29707731›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2018

Why Does a Universal Anti-Bullying Program Not Help All Children? Explaining Persistent Victimization During an Intervention.

Tessa M L Kaufman, Tina Kretschmer, Gijs Huitsing, René Veenstra

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. What Works for Whom in School-Based Anti-bullying Interventions? An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. A Large-Scale Replication of the Effectiveness of the KiVa Antibullying Program: a Randomized Controlled Trial in the Netherlands.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The P.E.A.C.E. Pack Program in Italian High Schools: An Intervention for Victims of Bullying.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tessa M L KaufmanDepartment of Sociology and Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology (ICS), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. t.m.l.kaufman@rug.nl.
Tina KretschmerDepartment of Pedagogy and Educational Science, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Gijs HuitsingDepartment of Sociology and Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology (ICS), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
René VeenstraDepartment of Sociology and Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology (ICS), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 453-14-016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although anti-bullying interventions are often effective, some children continue to be victimized. To increase knowledge of potential factors that might impede children's benefiting from an anti-bullying intervention, we examined potential reasons for individual differences in victimization trajectories during a group-based anti-bullying intervention. Data stem from a five-wave survey among 9122 children (7-12 years old; grades 2-5) who participated in the KiVa anti-bullying intervention (n = 6142) or were in control schools (n = 2980 children). Three trajectories were found in the intervention sample, representing children who experienced stable high, decreasing, or stable low/no victimization. A two-trajectory model of high and low trajectories represented the control sample best. Multinomial regressions on the intervention sample showed that children who experienced particularly high levels of peer rejection, internalizing problems, and lower quality parent-child relationships decreased less in victimization; thus these characteristics appeared to contribute to persistent victimization. The results call for tailored strategies in interventions aiming to reduce victimization for more children.

Indexed as

Program EvaluationBullyingChildCrime VictimsFemaleHealth PromotionHumansLogistic ModelsMaleSelf ReportAnti-bullying interventionGroup-based trajectoriesPersistent victimizationRisk characteristics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.