Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29578583›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2018

Multi-Invasion-Induced Rearrangements as a Pathway for Physiological and Pathological Recombination.

Aurèle Piazza, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanisms That Govern Recombinase Fidelity Control During Eukaryotic Homologous Recombination.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diffusion and distal linkages govern interchromosomal dynamics during meiotic prophase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Centromere scission drives chromosome shuffling and reproductive isolation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aurèle PiazzaDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Wolf-Dietrich HeyerDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Department of Genomes & Genetics · FRUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

RECOMBINATIONAL MECHANISMS OF DNA REPAIR IN EUKARYOTESR01GM058015 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI HEYER, WOLF-DIETRICH · 2000 to 2025
$8.8M
Regulation of Recombinational DNA RepairR01CA092276 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI HEYER, WOLF-DIETRICH · 2001 to 2020
$5.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA092276NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells mitigate the detrimental consequences of DNA damage on genome stability by attempting high fidelity repair. Homologous recombination templates DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair on an identical or near identical donor sequence in a process that can in principle access the entire genome. Other physiological processes, such as homolog recognition and pairing during meiosis, also harness the HR machinery using programmed DSBs to physically link homologs and generate crossovers. A consequence of the homology search process by a long nucleoprotein filament is the formation of multi-invasions (MI), a joint molecule in which the damaged ssDNA has invaded more than one donor molecule. Processing of MI joint molecules can compromise the integrity of both donor sites and lead to their rearrangement. Here, two mechanisms for the generation of rearrangements as a pathological consequence of MI processing are detailed and the potential relevance for non-allelic homologous recombination discussed. Finally, it is proposed that MI-induced crossover formation may be a feature of physiological recombination.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA DamageDNA RepairGenomic InstabilityHomologous RecombinationHumansMeiosiscopy number variationgenomic instabilityhomologous recombinationnon-allelic homologous recombinationrepeated sequencestructural varianttranslocation

Identifiers

PMID29578583
PMCPMC6072258
OpenAlexW2794099162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.