Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29339827›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

The impact of SO

Panagiotis Arapitsas, Graziano Guella, Fulvio Mattivi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Metabolome Atlas of Grape Biodiversity.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A Whiff of Sulfur: One Wind a Day Keeps the Doctor Away.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Panagiotis ArapitsasDepartment of Food Quality and Nutrition, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), San Michele all'Adige, Italy. panagiotis.arapitsas@gmail.com.
Graziano GuellaCentre for Agriculture, Food and the Environment, University of Trento, San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Fulvio MattiviDepartment of Food Quality and Nutrition, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), San Michele all'Adige, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wine has one of the broadest chemical profiles, and the common oenological practice of adding the antioxidant and antimicrobial sulfur dioxide has a major impact on its metabolomic fingerprint. In this study, we investigated novel discovered oenological reactions primarily occurring between wine metabolites and sulfur dioxide. The sulfonated derivatives of epicatechin, procyanidin B2, indole acetic acid, indole lactic acid and tryptophol were synthesized and for the first time quantified in wine. Analysis of 32 metabolites in 195 commercial wines (1986-2016 vintages) suggested that sulfonation of tryptophan metabolites characterised white wines, in contrast to red wines, where sulfonation of flavanols was preferred. The chemical profile of the oldest wines was strongly characterised by sulfonated flavanols and indoles, indicating that could be fundamental metabolites in explaining quality in both red and white aged wines. These findings offer new prospects for more precise use of sulfur dioxide in winemaking.

Indexed as

Chromatography, High Pressure LiquidFlavanonesIndolesMass SpectrometrySulfur DioxideTime FactorsVitisWineflavanoneFlavanonesIndolesSulfur Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID29339827
PMCPMC5770432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.