Trial reportCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2017
Pharmacologic Prevention of Incident Atrial Fibrillation: Long-Term Results From the ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial).
Trial report in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2017. The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map, but it casts no vote: it is a later paper about NCT00000542, whose primary report (PMID 12479764) speaks for the trial. It reports registered trial NCT00000542. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against
Compared with chlorthalidone, randomization to either lisinopril (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.15; CONCLUSIONS: Compared with chlorthalidone, treatment with lisinopril is not associated with a meaningful reduction in incident AF or AFL among older adults with a history of hypertension.
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
Antihypertensives×blood pressure
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →3 readable studies in this cell: 1 favour the treatment, 2 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The clinical pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation: outstanding questions from bedside to bench and back.Physiological reviews · 2026Review
- The Role of Early Risk Factor Modification and Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Substrate Remodeling Prevention.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- JCS/JHRS 2020 Guideline on Pharmacotherapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias.Journal of arrhythmia · 2022Article
- American Indians and atrial fibrillation.Heart rhythm O2 · 2022Review
- Genetic susceptibility, elevated blood pressure, and risk of atrial fibrillation: a Mendelian randomization study.Genome medicine · 2021Article
- Factors Modifying the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Associated With Atrial Premature Complexes in Patients With Hypertension.The American journal of cardiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
backgroundAlthough atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines indicate that pharmacological blockade of the renin-angiotensin system may be considered for primary AF prevention in hypertensive patients, previous studies have yielded conflicting results. We sought to determine whether randomization to lisinopril reduces incident AF or atrial flutter (AFL) compared with chlorthalidone in a large clinical trial cohort with extended post-trial surveillance. METHODS AND
resultsWe performed a secondary analysis of the ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial), a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial that enrolled hypertensive individuals ≥55 years of age with at least one other cardiovascular risk factor. Participants were randomly assigned to receive amlodipine, lisinopril, or chlorthalidone. Individuals with elevated fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were also randomized to pravastatin versus usual care. The primary outcome was the development of either AF or AFL as diagnosed by serial study ECGs or by Medicare claims data. Among 14 837 participants without prevalent AF or AFL, 2514 developed AF/AFL during a mean 7.5±3.2 years of follow-up. Compared with chlorthalidone, randomization to either lisinopril (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.15;
conclusionsCompared with chlorthalidone, treatment with lisinopril is not associated with a meaningful reduction in incident AF or AFL among older adults with a history of hypertension. CLINICAL
trial registrationURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00000542.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.