ArticleClinical linguistics & phonetics2018
Sequential processing deficit as a shared persisting biomarker in dyslexia and childhood apraxia of speech.
Article in Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developmental Convergence Across Diverse Genetic Architectures in Childhood Apraxia of Speech.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Three Unrelated Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech: Exome Sequencing and Functional Gene Analysis Imply a Role of Laminin-511 in Early Neurodevelopment.Case reports in genetics · 2026Article
- Distinct gut and oral microbiome patterns associated with dyslexia in a family-based cohort: A preliminary exploratory study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Reduced benefit from long-term item frequency contributes to short-term memory deficits in dyslexia.Memory & cognition · 2024Article
- Beyond Sounds: Decoding Speech Errors and Phonological Awareness in Preschoolers.Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups · 2024Article
- Dyslexics Exhibit an Orthographic, Not a Phonological Deficit in Lexical Decision.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2024Article
- Impact of oral motor task training on corticomotor pathways and diadochokinetic rates in young healthy participants.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Repeated series learning revisited with a novel prediction on the reduced effect of item frequency in dyslexia.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Sequencing Deficits and Phonological Speech Errors, But Not Articulation Errors, Predict Later Literacy Skills.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Differences and Commonalities in Children with Childhood Apraxia of Speech and Comorbid Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Multidimensional Perspective.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Identifying interactive biological pathways associated with reading disability.Brain and behavior · 2020Article
- Reading Outcomes for Individuals With Histories of Suspected Childhood Apraxia of Speech.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2019Article
- The role of short-term memory impairment in nonword repetition, real word repetition, and nonword decoding: A case study.Clinical linguistics & phonetics · 2018Article
- Enhancing online speech and language assessment: Item development for the remote adult language experiment (ReAL-E) tool.Journal of communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that individuals with dyslexia and individuals with childhood apraxia of speech share an underlying persisting deficit in processing sequential information. Levels of impairment (sensory encoding, memory, retrieval, and motor planning/programming) were also investigated. Participants were 22 adults with dyslexia, 10 adults with a probable history of childhood apraxia of speech (phCAS), and 22 typical controls. All participants completed nonword repetition, multisyllabic real word repetition, and nonword decoding tasks. Using phonological process analysis, errors were classified as sequence or substitution errors. Adults with dyslexia and adults with phCAS showed evidence of persisting nonword repetition deficits. In all three tasks, the adults in the two disorder groups produced more errors of both classes than the controls, but disproportionally more sequencing than substitution errors during the nonword repetition task. During the real word repetition task, the phCAS produced the most sequencing errors, whereas during the nonword decoding task, the dyslexia group produced the most sequencing errors. Performance during multisyllabic motor speech tasks, relative to monosyllabic conditions, was correlated with the sequencing error component during nonword repetition. The results provide evidence for a shared persisting sequential processing deficit in the dyslexia and phCAS groups during linguistic and motor speech tasks. Evidence for impairments in sensory encoding, short-term memory, and motor planning/programming was found in both disorder groups. Future studies should investigate clinical applications regarding preventative and targeted interventions towards cross-modal treatment effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.