ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2017
Diagnosis of Allergy to Mammals and Fish: Cross-Reactive vs. Specific Markers.
Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human Allergy to Cats and Dogs: Molecular and Environmental Determinants, Diagnosis, and Precision Management.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Hypoallergenic animals: A promise of hope for allergic patients?Allergologie select · 2024Review
- Case report of a child who may have developed anaphylaxis after ingesting raw horse meat by cross-reactivity of horse and cat pelt.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2023Article
- Component-Resolved Diagnosis Based on a Recombinant Variant of Mus m 1 Lipocalin Allergen.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Maillard Reaction Induced Changes in Allergenicity of Food.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Fish Allergenicity Modulation Using Tailored Enriched Diets-Where Are We?Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Occupational Respiratory Allergy: Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Management.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022Article
- [Exceptional occupational allergies due to food of animal origin].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2021Review
- Component-resolved diagnosis using guinea-pig allergens elucidates allergen sensitization profiles in allergy to furry animals.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021Article
- Molecular diagnosis in cat allergy.World journal of methodology · 2021Review
- Assessment of the effects of a work-related allergy to seafood on the reduction of earning capacity in the context of BK No. 5101.Allergologie select · 2021Review
- Linking cross-reactivity clusters of food and respiratory allergens in PAMD@ to asthma and duration of allergy.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2020Article
- The allergenic activity and clinical impact of individual IgE-antibody binding molecules from indoor allergen sources.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2020Review
- Homologous tropomyosins from vertebrate and invertebrate: Recombinant calibrator proteins in functional biological assays for tropomyosin allergenicity assessment of novel animal foods.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2020Article
- Keeping Allergen Names Clear and Defined.Frontiers in immunology · 2019Review
- The potential of component-resolved diagnosis in laboratory diagnostics of allergy.Biochemia medica · 2018Review
- Addressing Molecular Diagnosis of Occupational Allergies.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAllergen extracts are still widely used in allergy diagnosis as they are regarded as sensitive screening tools despite the fact that they may lack some minor allergens. Another drawback of extracts is their low specificity, which is due to the presence of cross-reactive allergens. Progress in allergen identification has disclosed a number of allergenic molecules of homologous sequence and structure which are present in different animal species. This review summarizes recent advances in mammalian and fish allergen identification and focuses on their clinical relevance. RECENT
findingsSerum albumins and parvalbumins are well-known animal panallergens. More recently several members of the lipocalin family were found to be cross-reactive between furry animals whereas in fish, additional allergens, enolase, aldolase and collagen, were found to be important and cross-reactive allergens. New epidemiological studies have analysed the prevalence and clinical relevance of mammalian and fish components. Primary sensitization can be distinguished from cross-sensitization by using marker allergens. Although substantial progress has been made in allergen identification, only few markers are commercially available for routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.