ArticlePloS one2017
Meat consumption reduction in Italian regions: Health co-benefits and decreases in GHG emissions.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive evaluation of epidemiological evidence on processed meat intake in relation to cancer, cardiovascular, metabolic diseases and all-cause mortality: an umbrella review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Diets for Dual Cardiovascular and Planetary Health: A Scoping Review.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and nutritional and anthropometric metrics in the PERSIAN dena cohort.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring Italian Consumers' Perceptions of Cultivated Meat: Barriers, Drivers, and Future Prospects.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Planetary Health Diet Adherence in Korean Adults: Association with the Korean Healthy Eating Index.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Human Exposure to Toxic Elements Through Meat Consumption in Africa: A Comprehensive Review of Scientific Literature.Nutrients · 2025Review
- What do Climate Change, Nutrition, and the Environment Have to do With Mental Health?American journal of lifestyle medicine · 2024Review
- The co-benefits of climate change mitigation strategies on cardiovascular health: a systematic review.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Socio-demographic and cross-country differences in attention to sustainable certifications and changes in food consumption.NPJ science of food · 2024Article
- The complex relationship between carbon literacy and pro-environmental actions among engineering students.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Simple dietary substitutions can reduce carbon footprints and improve dietary quality across diverse segments of the US population.Nature food · 2023Article
- Low Greenhouse Gas Emission Self-Selective Diets and Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in Adults 40 and Older: A Prospective Cohort Study in South Korea.Environmental health perspectives · 2023Article
- The neglected potential of red and processed meat replacement with alternative protein sources: Simulation modelling and systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- White meat consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Food & nutrition research · 2023Review
- Improving health and sustainability: Patterns of red and processed meat consumption across generations.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Article
- Lowering Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption With Environmental, Animal Welfare, and Health Arguments in Italy: An Online Experiment.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Understanding the Political Challenge of Red and Processed Meat Reduction for Healthy and Sustainable Food Systems: A Narrative Review of the Literature.International journal of health policy and management · 2021Review
- Strategy for primary prevention of non-communicable diseases (NCD) and mitigation of climate change in Italy.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2021Article
- Potential health impact of increasing adoption of sustainable dietary practices in Sweden.BMC public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAnimal agriculture has exponentially grown in recent decades in response to the rise in global demand for meat, even in countries like Italy that traditionally eat a Mediterranean, plant-based diet. Globalization related dietary changes are contributing to the epidemic of non-communicable diseases and to the global climate crisis, and are associated with huge carbon and water footprints. The objective of the study is to assess inequalities in health impacts and in attributable greenhouse gases-GHG emissions in Italy by hypothesizing different scenarios of reduction in red and processed meat consumption towards healthier consumption patterns more compliant with the recommendations of the Mediterranean food pyramid.
methodsWe used demographic and food consumption patterns from national surveys and risk relationships between meat intake and cardiovascular and colorectal cancer mortality from IARC and other meta-analyses. From the baseline data (year 2005-2006, average 406 gr/week beef and 245 gr/week processed meat), we considered hypothetical meat reduction scenarios according to international dietary guidelines such as the Mediterranean pyramid targets. For each geographical area (Northwest, Northeast, Centre, and South) and gender, we calculated the number of avoidable deaths from colorectal cancer, and cardiovascular disease among the adult population. Moreover, years of life gained by the adult population from 2012 to 2030 and changes in life expectancy of the 2012 birth cohort were quantified using gender-specific life tables. GHG emission reductions under Mediterranean scenario were estimated only for beef by applying the Global Warming Potential (GWP) coefficient to total consumption and to a low carbon food substitution in adult diet.
resultsThe deaths avoidable (as percentage change compared to baseline) according to the three reduction scenarios for beef consumption were between 2.3% and 4.5% for colorectal cancer, and between 2.1% and 4.0% for cardiovascular disease; higher benefits would be observed in Northwestern areas and among males. In parallel, 5% and 6.4% of colorectal cancer and CVD deaths would be avoided if the Italian population ate the advised quantity of processed meat. Life table analysis suggests that the scenario that is fully compliant with the Mediterranean diet model would save 5 million years of life lost prematurely among men and women over the next 18 years and would increase average life expectancy of future generations by over 7 months. Considering the environmental impact, emissions associated with the actual total intake of beef range from 12,900 to 21,800 Gg CO2 eq; emissions saved according to the Mediterranean scenario are in the range 8000-14000 Gg CO2 eq per year. The per capita reduction is 263 KgCO2eq/year/person with higher reductions in Northwestern and Central areas.
conclusionsIn Italy, scenarios for reducing beef consumption are consistent with significant health and environmental co-benefits on current and future generations. Results support introducing policies to promote healthier behavior towards red and processed meat in the adult population within an overall balanced and healthy dietary pattern. Interventions should address gender, vulnerable population groups, and geographical differences in order to be more effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.