Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28704965›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2017

Progress Evaluation for the Restaurant Industry Assessed by a Voluntary Marketing-Mix and Choice-Architecture Framework That Offers Strategies to Nudge American Customers toward Healthy Food Environments, 2006-2017.

Vivica Kraak, Tessa Englund, Sarah Misyak, Elena Serrano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Restaurant Advertising Expenditure Patterns in US Counties by Race, Ethnicity, and Income.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessing the Importance of Health in Choosing a Restaurant: An Empirical Study from Romania.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vivica KraakDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. vivica51@vt.edu.
Tessa EnglundDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. retessa@vt.edu.
Sarah MisyakVirginia Cooperative Extension's Family Nutrition Program, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. smisyak@vt.edu.
Elena SerranoDepartment of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. serrano@vt.edu.
Virginia Tech · USVirginia Cooperative Extension · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumption of restaurant food and beverage products high in fat, sugar and sodium contribute to obesity and non-communicable diseases. We evaluated restaurant-sector progress to promote healthy food environments for Americans. We conducted a desk review of seven electronic databases (January 2006-January 2017) to examine restaurant strategies used to promote healthful options in the United States (U.S.). Evidence selection (

Indexed as

Health PromotionRestaurantsChoice BehaviorHumansMarketingUnited Stateschoice-architecturehealthy food environmentsrestaurants

Identifiers

PMID28704965
PMCPMC5551198
OpenAlexW2735735204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.