Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28636806›Full record

ArticleChemical biology & drug design2018

pH-dependent general base catalyzed activation rather than isocyanate liberation may explain the superior anticancer efficacy of laromustine compared to related 1,2-bis(methylsulfonyl)-1-(2-chloroethyl)hydrazine prodrugs.

Philip G Penketh, Richard A Finch, Rachel Sauro, Raymond P Baumann, Elena S Ratner, Krishnamurthy Shyam

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical biology & drug design, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philip G PenkethDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3831-4086
Richard A FinchDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Bastrop, TX, USA.
Rachel SauroDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Raymond P BaumannDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Elena S RatnerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Krishnamurthy ShyamDepartment of Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
DEVELOPMENT OF ANTICANCER 1, 2-BIS(SULFONYL) HYDRAZINESR01CA090671 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SARTORELLI, ALAN CLAYTON · 2002 to 2009
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS R01 CA090671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laromustine (also known as cloretazine, onrigin, VNP40101M, 101M) is a prodrug of 90CE, a short-lived chloroethylating agent with anticancer activity. The short half-life of 90CE necessitates the use of latentiated prodrug forms for in vivo treatments. Alkylaminocarbonyl-based prodrugs such as laromustine exhibit significantly superior in vivo activity in several murine tumor models compared to analogs utilizing acyl, and alkoxycarbonyl latentiating groups. The alkylaminocarbonyl prodrugs possess two exclusive characteristics: (i) They are primarily unmasked by spontaneous base catalyzed elimination; and (ii) they liberate a reactive carbamoylating species. Previous speculations as to the therapeutic superiority of laromustine have focused upon the inhibition of enzymes by carbamoylation. We have investigated the therapeutic interactions of analogs with segregated chloroethylating and carbamoylating activities (singly and in combination) in the in vivo murine L1210 leukemia model. The combined treatment with chloroethylating and carbamoylating prodrugs failed to result in any synergism and produced a reduction in the therapeutic efficacy compared to the chloroethylating prodrug alone. Evidence supporting an alternative explanation for the superior tumor selectivity of laromustine is presented that is centered upon the high pH sensitivity of its base catalyzed activation, and the more alkaline intracellular pH values commonly found within tumor cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCatalysisCell Line, TumorDNADrug DesignFemaleHalf-LifeHumansHydrazinesHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIsocyanatesLeukemiaMiceProdrugsProtein Carbamylation1,2-bis(methylsulfonyl)-1-(2-chloroethyl)hydrazineAntineoplastic AgentsDNAHydrazinesIsocyanateslaromustineProdrugsSulfonamidesalkylationcross-linkingintracellular pHlaromustinemethyl isocyanateMGMTphosphatesulfonylhydrazinetargeted chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID28636806
PMCPMC5740024
OpenAlexW2654402681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.