Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28441731›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Polyphenolic Compounds and Digestive Enzymes: In Vitro Non-Covalent Interactions.

Alejandra I Martinez-Gonzalez, Ángel G Díaz-Sánchez, Laura A de la Rosa, Claudia L Vargas-Requena, Ismael Bustos-Jaimes, And Emilio Alvarez-Parrilla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. In Vitro Bioactivity of a Supercritical COMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. In Vitro Influence of a Chemically CharacterizedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alejandra I Martinez-GonzalezDepartamento de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez (32310), Mexico. aimg.2086@gmail.com.
Ángel G Díaz-SánchezDepartamento de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez (32310), Mexico. angel.diaz@uacj.mx.
Laura A de la RosaDepartamento de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez (32310), Mexico. ldelaros@uacj.mx.
Claudia L Vargas-RequenaDepartamento de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez (32310), Mexico. cvargas@uacj.mx.
Ismael Bustos-JaimesDepartamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F. (04510), Mexico. ismaelb@unam.mx.
And Emilio Alvarez-ParrillaDepartamento de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez (32310), Mexico. ealvarez@uacj.mx.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The digestive enzymes-polyphenolic compounds (PCs) interactions behind the inhibition of these enzymes have not been completely studied. The existing studies have mainly analyzed polyphenolic extracts and reported inhibition percentages of catalytic activities determined by UV-Vis spectroscopy techniques. Recently, pure PCs and new methods such as isothermal titration calorimetry and circular dichroism have been applied to describe these interactions. The present review focuses on PCs structural characteristics behind the inhibition of digestive enzymes, and progress of the used methods. Some characteristics such as molecular weight, number and position of substitution, and glycosylation of flavonoids seem to be related to the inhibitory effect of PCs; also, this effect seems to be different for carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes and proteases. The digestive enzyme-PCs molecular interactions have shown that non-covalent binding, mostly by van der Waals forces, hydrogen binding, hydrophobic binding, and other electrostatic forces regulate them. These interactions were mainly associated to non-competitive type inhibitions of the enzymatic activities. The present review emphasizes on the digestive enzymes such as α-glycosidase (AG), α-amylase (PA), lipase (PL), pepsin (PE), trypsin (TP), and chymotrypsin (CT). Existing studies conducted in vitro allow one to elucidate the characteristics of the structure-function relationships, where differences between the structures of PCs might be the reason for different in vivo effects.

Indexed as

HumansHydrogen BondingHydrolasesHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsModels, MolecularPolyphenolsProtein BindingThermodynamicsHydrolasesPolyphenolsdigestive enzymesenzymatic inhibitionhydrogen bindinghydrophobic bindingpolyphenolic compoundsstructurevan der Waals forces

Identifiers

PMID28441731
PMCPMC6154557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.